首页> 外文学位 >Effect of age, gender, race, and type of opioid on opioid side effects: Evaluation of tools to analyze observational studies.
【24h】

Effect of age, gender, race, and type of opioid on opioid side effects: Evaluation of tools to analyze observational studies.

机译:年龄,性别,种族和阿片类药物类型对阿片类药物副作用的影响:评估观察性研究工具的评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Opioids are the pillar of pain management, but little is known about factors that increase the risk of developing side effects. In observational studies it is likely that the groups compared are different, and it is crucial to control for these differences to obtain valid results. There are several tools that are used for this purpose. However, it is not always clear what is the preferable strategy. The specific goal of this dissertation was to improve knowledge about opioid side effects and test new methods to accomplish that. The aims were: First, to compare matching with a fixed number of controls to matching with a variable number of controls. Second, to compare logistic regression to propensity score. Third, in light of steps one and two, to use the appropriate technique to evaluate the effect of type of opioid, age, gender, and race on opioid side effects. For the first two aims, we performed Monte Carlo simulations and carried out comparisons of the techniques in terms of bias, precision, robustness, and type I and II errors. For the third aim, we performed a secondary analysis of a post-marketing surveillance study. For the analysis of this aim, we used logistic regression because we demonstrated that it was a better approach for this purpose than matching or the propensity scores. We found that matching with a variable number of controls removed more bias than matching with a fixed number of controls with little loss in precision. We also found that propensity scores were a good alternative to control for imbalances when there were seven or fewer events per confounder. However, in these circumstances the propensity scores had low power. Logistic regression was a better choice when there were at least eight events per confounder. Finally, we found that meperidine produced less nausea/vomiting and less respiratory depression than morphine. The risk of respiratory depression increased with age. Women exhibited nausea/vomiting more than men. Caucasians exhibited nausea/vomiting more than African Americans. The results of this dissertation should be of interest to researchers involved in observational studies and to providers who care for patients receiving opioids.
机译:阿片类药物是疼痛控制的基础,但对于增加产生副作用风险的因素知之甚少。在观察性研究中,比较的组很可能是不同的,控制这些差异以获得有效的结果至关重要。有几种用于此目的的工具。但是,并非总是很清楚哪种策略更合适。本文的具体目标是提高对阿片类药物副作用的认识,并测试实现这一目标的新方法。目的是:首先,比较具有固定数量的控件的匹配与具有可变数量的控件的匹配。第二,比较逻辑回归与倾向得分。第三,根据第一步和第二步,使用适当的技术来评估阿片类药物的类型,年龄,性别和种族对阿片类药物副作用的影响。对于前两个目标,我们进行了蒙特卡洛模拟,并就偏差,精度,鲁棒性以及I型和II型误差对这些技术进行了比较。为了实现第三个目标,我们对售后监测研究进行了次要分析。对于此目标的分析,我们使用逻辑回归,因为我们证明了达到此目的比匹配或倾向得分更好。我们发现,与数量固定的控件匹配比与固定数量的控件匹配消除了更多的偏差,而精度损失很小。我们还发现,当每个混杂因素发生七个或更少的事件时,倾向评分是控制失衡的好选择。但是,在这些情况下,倾向得分的效力较低。当每个混杂因素至少有八个事件时,逻辑回归是更好的选择。最后,我们发现吗啡比吗啡产生更少的恶心/呕吐和呼吸抑制。呼吸抑制的风险随着年龄的增长而增加。女性比男性表现出更多的恶心/呕吐。高加索人比非裔美国人表现出更多的恶心/呕吐。从事观察研究的研究人员以及护理接受阿片类药物患者的医疗服务提供者应该对本论文的结果感兴趣。

著录项

  • 作者

    Cepeda, Maria Soledad.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Pennsylvania.;

  • 授予单位 University of Pennsylvania.;
  • 学科 Public health.;Pharmaceutical sciences.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2002
  • 页码 132 p.
  • 总页数 132
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号