首页> 外文学位 >Gogol's Ghosts On the History of Nikolai Gogol in Russian Literary Criticism (1891--1944).
【24h】

Gogol's Ghosts On the History of Nikolai Gogol in Russian Literary Criticism (1891--1944).

机译:戈果在《俄罗斯文学评论》(1891--1944年)中对尼古拉·戈果的历史产生的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

"Gogol's Ghosts" reexamines a radical change in perceptions of the writer Nikolai Gogol (1809-1852) that occurs in Russian literary criticism during the Modernist period. For much of the nineteenth century the conventional wisdom considered Gogol the founder of Russian realism, but with the fin de siecle this consensus began to disintegrate, beginning with the writings of Vasilii Rozanov, who vehemently refused to accept Gogol as a realist, and later thanks to the efforts of critics associated with Symbolism and Formalism to make Gogol their own. Robert Maguire has described the result of these revisions in terms of a shift in reference: the "source of Gogol's art" was relocated from the "external world" to an "internal world," that is, from an objective reality to a subjective state of the soul. Instead of depicting the world as it is, as the Symbolist Valerii Briusov argued, Gogol populated it with the specters of his imagination.;With few exceptions, this understanding of the shift in criticism determined the course of twentieth-century Gogol scholarship, and it continues to exert a powerful influence in our own. When we read Gogol today, more often than not we do so in search of an aesthetic consciousness as it emerges and develops in Gogol's work. We attempt to read his "specters.".;However, my dissertation argues that maintaining this narrative of the turn in Gogol criticism and the mode of reading it has inspired requires forgetting other aspects of the modernist critical legacy. Above all it requires ignoring the sheer negativity of Rozanov's initial critique: while Rozanov, anticipating his successors, at first attempts to read Gogol's works as psychobiography, he gradually fails to recognize anything in them but an inhuman, Medusa-like excess of writing. The question becomes not one of this or that referent, but of reference as such. My dissertation aims to return this question to Gogol's critical history, through close readings of criticism by Rozanov, Briusov, Annenskii, Eikhenbaum, Bakhtin, and Nabokov, among others, and to bring it to bear on the reading of Gogol's works, such as "Overcoat," "Portrait," and Dead Souls.
机译:“戈果的鬼魂”重新审视了作家尼古拉·戈果(Nikolai Gogol,1809-1852年)在现代主义时期俄罗斯文学批评中所发生的观念上的根本变化。在19世纪的大部分时间里,传统观念都认为Gogol是俄罗斯现实主义的创始人,但随着最后的共识,这种共识开始瓦解,从Vasilii Rozanov的著作开始,他强烈地拒绝接受Gogol作为现实主义者,后来感谢与象征主义和形式主义相关的批评家们的努力,使果戈里人成为了自己。罗伯特·马奎尔(Robert Maguire)通过参照的变化描述了这些修改的结果:“果戈里艺术的来源”从“外部世界”转移到“内部世界”,即从客观现实转变为主观状态。灵魂的Gogol并没有像象征主义者Valerii Briusov所描述的那样真实地描绘世界,它充满了他的想象力。除少数例外,这种对批评转变的理解决定了20世纪Gogol学术研究的进程,继续在我们自己中发挥强大的影响力。今天,当我们阅读Gogol时,我们经常会在Gogol的作品中寻找和发展审美意识的过程中寻找审美意识。我们试图阅读他的“旁观者”。;但是,我的论文认为,要保持对果戈里批评的转折及其叙事方式的叙述,就需要忘记现代主义批判遗产的其他方面。最重要的是,它需要忽略罗扎诺夫最初的批判的纯粹否定性:当罗扎诺夫期待他的继任者时,一开始尝试将果戈尔的作品读为心理传记,但他渐渐地看不到其中的任何东西,只是一种非人性的,类似于美杜莎的写作。这个问题不是这个或那个指称的一个,而是这样的指称。我的论文旨在通过仔细阅读罗扎诺夫(Rozanov),布里乌索夫(Briusov),安嫩斯基(Annenskii),艾肯鲍姆(Eikhenbaum),巴赫金(Bakhtin)和纳博科夫(Nabokov)等人的批评,将这个问题带回到果戈理的批判历史,并将其带入戈果的著作中,例如“大衣”,“肖像”和“亡灵”。

著录项

  • 作者

    Walker, Matthew.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Wisconsin - Madison.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Wisconsin - Madison.;
  • 学科 Literature Slavic and East European.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 393 p.
  • 总页数 393
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号