首页> 外文学位 >CAPA (Computer-Assisted Personalized Assignments) in a large university setting.
【24h】

CAPA (Computer-Assisted Personalized Assignments) in a large university setting.

机译:大型大学环境中的CAPA(计算机辅助个性化作业)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

A systematic study of the online homework system CAPA (Computer-Assisted Personalized Assignments) was carried out in the calculus-based introductory physics course at the University of Colorado, Boulder during the fall 2001 semester (N ≈ 500). This study looked at the effects CAPA had on student learning and attitudes. The students in this class were split into two groups. One group was initially assigned to CAPA; the other group was assigned to traditional homework. At mid-semester the groups switched identities (the students who began the course using CAPA had to complete traditional homework). Exam scores and Force and Motion Concept Evaluation gains showed no statistically significant differences between the groups. Written quizzes and exams were collected from a smaller sample of students and analyzed using a problem-solving rubric. No statistically significant differences in the problem solving abilities of the groups were seen. Student opinions about the effect each homework type had on their learning were elicited. Students with non-expert-like epistemologies felt that CAPA was a better learning tool while students with expert-like epistemologies believed that traditional homework was a better learning tool. Problem solving interviews were conducted weekly with 9 students. From the analysis of this data a problem solving characterization of students using CAPA and traditional homework was inferred. Four types of problems solvers emerged—the CAPA Thinker, Traditional Thinker, CAPA Guesser, and Traditional Guesser. Thinkers tend to have expert-like epistemological beliefs. Guessers generally have non-expert-like epistemologies. On quantitative problems traditional homework promoted metacognitive processes in the Traditional Thinker and CAPA hindered self-evaluation among CAPA Thinkers. On qualitative problems, the opposite was observed to occur. When the students switched homework types at mid-semester it was expected that CAPA Thinkers would become Traditional Thinkers and vice versa. Similar results were expected among Guessers. However, there were students who “switched” from Traditional Thinkers to CAPA Guessers as well as students who “switched” from CAPA Guesser to Traditional Thinker. This may imply that CAPA hinders metacognitive behaviors. Implications for the development of online homework systems are discussed. Directions for future research are suggested.
机译:在2001年秋季的学期中,科罗拉多大学博尔德分校的基于微积分的入门物理学课程对在线作业系统CAPA(计算机辅助个性化作业)进行了系统研究(N≈ 500)。这项研究研究了CAPA对学生学习和态度的影响。该班学生分为两组。最初将一个小组分配给CAPA;另一组被分配到传统的家庭作业。在学期中,小组改变了身份(使用CAPA开始课程的学生必须完成传统的家庭作业)。考试分数和“力与运动概念评估”获得的结果表明,两组之间在统计学上没有显着差异。从较小的学生样本中收集书面测验和考试,并使用解决问题的规则进行分析。在小组的问题解决能力上没有统计学上的显着差异。引起了学生对每种作业类型对其学习的影响的意见。具有非专家知识论的学生认为CAPA是更好的学习工具,而具有专家知识论的学生则认为传统家庭作业是更好的学习工具。每周对9名学生进行问题解决访谈。通过对这些数据的分析,可以推断出使用CAPA和传统家庭作业解决学生特征的问题。出现了四种类型的问题解决者:CAPA思想家,传统思想家,CAPA Guesser和传统Guesser。思想家倾向于具有专家般的认识论信念。猜测者通常具有非专家般的认识论。关于定量问题,传统作业在传统思想家中促进了元认知过程,而CAPA阻碍了CAPA思想家之间的自我评估。在定性问题上,观察到相反的情况。当学生在学期中转换作业类型时,预计CAPA思想家将成为传统思想家,反之亦然。在Guessers中预期会有类似的结果。但是,有些学生从传统思想家“转变”为CAPA Guessers,也有一些学生从CAPA Guesser“转变”为传统思想家。这可能暗示CAPA阻碍了元认知行为。讨论了对在线作业系统开发的影响。建议今后的研究方向。

著录项

  • 作者

    Pascarella, Andrea M.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Colorado at Boulder.;

  • 授予单位 University of Colorado at Boulder.;
  • 学科 Physics General.; Education Sciences.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2002
  • 页码 p.2872
  • 总页数 326
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 物理学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号