首页> 外文学位 >A theory of meta-narrative-ethics: Michel Foucault and the Canadian debate on reproductive and genetic technologies.
【24h】

A theory of meta-narrative-ethics: Michel Foucault and the Canadian debate on reproductive and genetic technologies.

机译:元叙事伦理学理论:米歇尔·福柯(Michel Foucault)和加拿大有关生殖和遗传技术的辩论。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This thesis develops a theory of meta-narrative-ethics. Building on an elaboration in the domain of literature-and-medicine, my theory explores the relationship between narrative and subjectivity in the Canadian debate on reproductive technologies during the 1990s. The purpose is to illuminate ontological narrativity, a concept I develop referring to that aspect of a narrative that suggests a relationship that the subject ought to have with itself. Ethics is reinterpreted with a lens fashioned from the philosophy of Michel Foucault and I present an ethical analysis of the debate on reproductive technologies in terms of how the contemporary subject is led to rethink itself as a reproducing being.;My project begins with a comparison of two literary narratives, each of which stake out different positions in the debate on reproductive technologies. A feminist-poet and a surgeon-writer show that there is a wide gulf between participates in the debate, but the reason that I begin here is not to decide who is right or wrong but to suggest that different points of view show different rapport à soi.;The first part of this dissertation sets the context. It addresses first the domain of modern ethical thinking and presents a sketch of the essentials of modern ethics as well as two important critiques. I then move to narrative to show how widely it has come to be used, and I present the concept in terms of ethics, epistemology, and ontology. It is here that I set the groundwork for ontological narrativity.;Chapters 4, 5 and 6 form the next part of my thesis, which focuses on methodological development. A presentation of Foucault's thought takes place, which helps develop a theoretical basis for my theory of meta-narrative-ethics. I begin with a foucauldian interpretation of bioethics to show how foucauldian concepts give a different perspective, and then turn, in chapter 5, to a detailed presentation of foucauldian theorizing. In chapter 6, I present my theory of meta-narrative-ethics. This theory is based on a combination of Foucault's first period, called archaeology, and his third period, which was concerned with subjectivity. This method establishes an important connection between l'énoncé and rapport à soi, the statement and the relationship that the self has with itself. Both are essential to idea of ontological narrativity.;The third and forth parts present the meta-narrative-ethical analysis of the debate on reproductive technologies. It extracts statements from the participants in the debate and it discerns the relationships that are suggested by the ontological narrativity of each voice. Chapters 7, 8 and 9 present the political voice, the professional voice, and the voice of the media respectively. Chapter 10 concerns rapport à soi and the specific conception of the Canadian self found in the debate. I conclude that while there was potential in the debate for an understanding of ethics to go beyond what is found in typically modern analyses, what the debate does present in terms of subjectivity is ultimately rooted in the modern tradition. (Abstract shortened by UMI.).
机译:本文提出了一种元叙事伦理学。在对文学和医学领域进行详尽阐述的基础上,我的理论探索了1990年代加拿大有关生殖技术的辩论中的叙事与主观性之间的关系。目的是阐明本体的叙述性,这是我根据叙述的这一方面提出的概念,提出了主体应该与自身建立的关系。伦理学是用米歇尔·福柯(Michel Foucault)的哲学思想重新诠释的,我就当代技术如何引发人们对自身作为生殖生物的反思来对生殖技术的辩论进行伦理分析。两种文学叙事,在关于生殖技术的辩论中,每种叙事都有不同的立场。女权诗人和外科医生作家表明参加辩论之间存在很大鸿沟,但我从这里开始的原因并不是要确定谁是对还是错,而是要建议不同的观点表现出不同的融洽关系à soi .;本论文的第一部分设置了上下文。它首先论述了现代伦理思想的领域,并提出了现代伦理学基本原理的草图以及两个重要的批评。然后,我进入叙述以说明它已被广泛使用,并从伦理学,认识论和本体论的角度介绍了这一概念。在这里,我为本体的叙述性奠定了基础。第4、5和6章构成了本文的下一部分,重点是方法论的发展。对福柯的思想进行了介绍,这有助于为我的元叙事伦理学理论奠定理论基础。我从对生物伦理​​学的福柯尔式解释开始,以展示福柯尔式概念如何给出不同的观点,然后在第5章中,对福柯尔式理论进行详细介绍。在第六章中,我介绍了我的元叙事伦理学。该理论是基于福柯的第一个时期(称为考古学)和他的第三个时期(与主体性有关)的结合。这种方法在l'énoncé和融洽的关系,陈述与自我之间的关系之间建立了重要的联系。两者对于本体论叙事的观念都是必不可少的。第三和第四部分介绍了生殖技术辩论的元叙事伦理分析。它从辩论的参与者中提取陈述,并辨别每种声音的本体叙述性所暗示的关系。第7、8和9章分别介绍了政治声音,专业声音和媒体声音。第10章涉及融洽关系以及辩论中发现的加拿大自我的特定概念。我得出的结论是,尽管辩论中有可能对伦理学的理解超出典型现代分析中所发现的范围,但辩论在主观性方面的表现最终还是植根于现代传统。 (摘要由UMI缩短。)。

著录项

  • 作者

    Goldstein, Daniel M.;

  • 作者单位

    Universite de Montreal (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 Universite de Montreal (Canada).;
  • 学科 Philosophy.;Theology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2002
  • 页码 297 p.
  • 总页数 297
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 肿瘤学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号