首页> 外文学位 >Electronic commerce education: An analysis of practitioner and academic perceptions of essential skills and knowledge.
【24h】

Electronic commerce education: An analysis of practitioner and academic perceptions of essential skills and knowledge.

机译:电子商务教育:对从业者和基本技能和知识的学术看法的分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Business colleges and universities have introduced electronic commerce (EC) programs at unprecedented rates. Concern has arisen regarding the content quality of such programs. This multimethod study attempted to explore the status of EC business education in the United States. Practitioner and academician preferences were identified and compared for two variables, program and curriculum content.;A Delphi panel of 30 "experts" was surveyed through a series of three questionnaires. The first generated a list of essential skill and knowledge elements that should be included in EC programs. The remaining rounds asked respondents to rate program and content variables on a five-point Likert-like scale. Group mean (level of importance/appropriateness) and standard deviation (level of group agreement) were determined for each item Items were then ranked per means. Graduate degree programs, specifically M.B.A. programs, were preferred in traditional business fields with concentrations in EC. Content preferences tended to focus on EC specific elements and tended to be information technology related.;Fifty-one EC business programs offered by a sample of 100 AACSB-accredited colleges and universities were studied through content analysis. Most were graduate degree programs specifically in EC. Most were M.B.A. programs. Content preferences, based on frequency counts, tended to be for non-EC specific elements. Required courses tended to focus on management related topics while elective courses tended to focus on information technology topics.;Descriptive analysis was used to compare and contrast practitioner and academician preferences. Both believed graduate degree programs, specifically M.B.A. programs, were most appropriate. There was disagreement regarding preferred program titles. Disagreement was most pronounced for the content variable. Of the skill and knowledge elements that practitioners rated "Important," only 15 percent were included in the EC business programs. M.B.A. programs were found to provide the greatest coverage of the "Important" elements, however, this depended on the elective courses selected. Overall, the differences outweigh the similarities, indicating that a perception gap exists between the two stakeholder groups.
机译:商学院和大学已经以前所未有的速度推出了电子商务(EC)计划。人们对这种程序的内容质量产生了担忧。这项多方法研究试图探索美国EC商业教育的状况。确定了从业者和院士的喜好,并比较了两个变量,即课程和课程的内容。通过一系列的三个问卷调查了由30位“专家”组成的Delphi小组。首先生成了应包含在EC计划中的基本技能和知识要素的列表。剩余的回合要求受访者以五点类李克特量表对节目和内容变量进行评分。确定每个项目的组均值(重要性/适当性水平)和标准差(组一致性水平),然后按均值对项目进行排名。研究生学位课程,特别是M.B.A.课程,在集中于EC的传统业务领域中是首选。内容偏好倾向于集中在EC的特定元素上,并倾向于与信息技术相关。;通过内容分析研究了由100家获得AACSB认证的高校样本提供的51个EC商业计划。大多数是专门针对欧共体的研究生学位课程。大多数是MBA课程。基于频率计数的内容偏好通常针对非EC特定元素。必修课往往侧重于管理相关主题,而选修课则侧重于信息技术主题。描述性分析用于比较和对比从业人员和院士的偏好。两者都认为最合适的是研究生学位课程,特别是MBA课程。关于首选程序名称存在分歧。对于内容变量,分歧最为明显。从业人员将技能和知识要素评为“重要”,只有15%的人才被纳入EC业务计划。人们发现工商管理硕士课程提供了对“重要”要素的最大覆盖,但是,这取决于所选的选修课程。总体而言,差异大于相似之处,表明两个利益相关者群体之间存在认知差距。

著录项

  • 作者

    Burkey, Julie Layne.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Sarasota.;

  • 授予单位 University of Sarasota.;
  • 学科 Business education.;Management.
  • 学位 D.B.A.
  • 年度 2002
  • 页码 236 p.
  • 总页数 236
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 语言学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号