首页> 外文学位 >Party recruitment and political participation in mainland China.
【24h】

Party recruitment and political participation in mainland China.

机译:在中国大陆的党招募和政治参与。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Despite fundamental differences between liberal democracies and authoritarian regimes, ordinary citizens in the latter polities also try to influence government policy outcomes. Since the launch of the reforms more than two decades ago, the Chinese Communist Party has abandoned the Maoist mobilization of citizens in mass political campaigns. Instead, political mobilization is achieved through the process of careful recruitment of party members. The Party's decision to recruit a citizen (or not) is a strategic choice conditioned on the expected participatory behavior of individual citizens. At the same time, political participation by individual citizens to influence government policy takes into account the Party's recruitment decision. Participation as a recruited or un-recruited citizen are two distinct outcomes that bring different benefits and costs for the individuals involved. The patterns of political recruitment and participation can be seen as the aggregate outcome of the choices made by the Party and by individual citizens. My research studies whether and how these two political choices are interdependent processes of decision making and explores the effects of important factors such as age, education, and social organization.; The dissertation proceeds through multiple approaches. I begin by proposing a new conceptualization of the relationship between Party recruitment and political participation, which establishes an important connection between two thus far separate bodies of literature. I then generate hypotheses about both the Party's and an individual citizen's preferences over different outcomes of recruitment and participation. This incorporates my interviews of Party officials, ordinary Party members, and non-Party masses during my field research. A simple game theory model lays the foundation for the statistical analysis of data from a 1993–94 national survey. I first show that recruitment and participation respectively are significant predictors of each other. In the third step, I find that participation by recruited citizens and participation by un-recruited citizens are indeed determined by distinct sets of utility components. Finally, to test the joint hypotheses I apply the statistical strategic method, which is specifically designed for the analysis of data where strategic elements can render the results of logit or probit problematic.
机译:尽管自由民主政体与威权政体之间存在根本性差异,但后者政体中的普通公民也试图影响政府的政策成果。自二十多年前发起改革以来,中国共产党在群众政治运动中放弃了动员公民的毛派运动。相反,通过认真招募党员来实现政治动员。党的决定(或不决定)招募公民是一项战略选择,取决于个人公民的预期参与行为。同时,个人公民的政治参与以影响政府政策也考虑了党的招聘决定。作为新兵或新兵的参与是两个截然不同的结果,给参与的个人带来不同的利益和成本。政治招募和参与的方式可以看作是党和公民个人选择的总结果。我的研究研究了这两种政治选择是否以及如何是相互依赖的决策过程,并探讨了诸如年龄,教育程度和社会组织等重要因素的影响。本文通过多种方法进行研究。首先,我提出了关于党的招募与政治参与之间的关系的新概念,该关系在两个迄今为止截然不同的文学体系之间建立了重要的联系。然后,我就党和个人公民对招聘和参与的不同结果的偏爱产生假设。这包括我在实地研究中对党员,普通党员和非党员的采访。一个简单的博弈论模型为1993-94年全国调查的数据进行统计分析奠定了基础。我首先表明招聘和参与分别是彼此的重要预测因子。在第三步中,我发现被征募公民的参与和未被征募公民的参与的确由公用事业的不同集合决定。最后,为了检验联合假设,我应用了统计策略方法,该方法专门设计用于数据分析,在这些数据中,策略元素会使logit或probit的结果出现问题。

著录项

  • 作者

    Guo, Gang.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Rochester.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Rochester.;
  • 学科 Political Science General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2002
  • 页码 197 p.
  • 总页数 197
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 政治理论;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号