首页> 外文学位 >Goethe's phenomenology of nature and Husserl's transcendental subjectivity: Seeing the dangers of abstraction (Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, Edmund Husserl).
【24h】

Goethe's phenomenology of nature and Husserl's transcendental subjectivity: Seeing the dangers of abstraction (Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, Edmund Husserl).

机译:歌德的自然现象学和胡塞尔的先验主观性:看到抽象的危险(约翰·沃尔夫冈·冯·歌德,埃德蒙·胡塞尔)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The purpose of this dissertation is twofold: (1) To demonstrate a process whereby phenomena are “drawn-out” from their experiential ground, placed within a mathematical-causal structure, and then used to formulate scientific theories. This transposition of ideal forms for concrete reality takes the “constituted” forms as the basis for scientific knowledge. the natural world are filtered out of this mathematical-causal matrix. The danger arises when the subject becomes objectified, which leads to alienation from our own knowledge, and from one another as well. Reality, however, is neither “objective” nor “subjective,” but experiential, with the terms “objective” and “subjective” being examine the phenomenology of Edmund Husserl, especially his concept of intentionality, as a way to expand our narrow definition of reason to include human experience. This method is “transcendental” to cultural norms, which means that it establishes the structural conditions that make our knowledge of the world possible. Husserl's phenomenological method is then applied to Goethe's epistemology, providing a philosophical basis for Goethe's scientific methodology. It is argued here that Goethe took the first steps toward a rigorous way of knowing grounded in human experience, pointing toward an epistemology method, Goethe's scientific method and experiments can be more clearly seen through the light of experience.; The conclusion drawn is that consciousness evidences “intentionality” and therefore has the capacity for a more immediate way of knowing. This way of knowing more accurately reflects our qualitative experiences. With Goethe's method, these qualitative experiences can be placed within a scientific framework without being objectified. Goethe's scientific methodology opens up the possibility for us to get “back to things themselves,” and to ground our knowledge in human experience. While the focus here is on epistemology in the natural sciences, implications for the social sciences and humanities are discussed as well.
机译:本文的目的是双重的:(1)演示一种过程,其中现象从其经验基础``抽出'',置于数学因果结构中,然后用于阐述科学理论。具体现实的理想形式的这种转换以“构成”形式为科学知识的基础。自然世界被从这个数学因果矩阵中滤除。当主题变得客观化时,就会出现危险,这会导致我们自己的知识以及彼此之间的疏远。然而,现实既不是“客观的”也不是“主观的”,而是经验的,用“客观的”和“主观的”这两个术语来检验埃德蒙·胡塞尔的现象学,尤其是他的意向性概念,以此来扩展我们对狭义的定义。包含人类经验的理由。这种方法是文化规范的“先验”,这意味着它建立了使我们对世界了解成为可能的结构条件。胡塞尔的现象学方法随后被应用到歌德的认识论中,为歌德的科学方法论提供了哲学基础。有人认为,歌德迈出了迈向基于人类经验的严格认识方式的第一步,指出了一种认识论方法,通过经验可以更清楚地看到歌德的科学方法和实验。得出的结论是,意识证明了“意图”,因此有能力以更直接的方式进行了解。这种更准确的了解方式反映了我们的定性体验。使用歌德的方法,这些定性的经验可以被放置在一个科学的框架内而没有被客观化。歌德的科学方法为我们提供了“回到事物本身”并将我们的知识立足于人类经验的可能性。虽然这里的重点是自然科学中的认识论,但同时也讨论了对社会科学和人文科学的影响。

著录项

  • 作者

    Calabro, Robert Joseph.;

  • 作者单位

    Columbia University.;

  • 授予单位 Columbia University.;
  • 学科 Philosophy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2002
  • 页码 190 p.
  • 总页数 190
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 哲学理论;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:46:06

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号