首页> 外文学位 >Prebiotics and probiotics: Impact on gut microbial populations, nutrient digestibilities, fecal protein catabolite concentrations, and immune function of humans and dogs.
【24h】

Prebiotics and probiotics: Impact on gut microbial populations, nutrient digestibilities, fecal protein catabolite concentrations, and immune function of humans and dogs.

机译:益生元和益生菌:对肠道微生物种群,营养消化率,粪便蛋白质分解代谢物浓度以及人与狗的免疫功能的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Prebiotics and probiotics are dietary constituents used to beneficially alter microbial populations in the gut and improve host health. Although the supplementation of these functional ingredients has demonstrated beneficial effects in several species, very little has been studied in humans and dogs. Therefore, the overall objective of this research was to evaluate the effects of supplemental prebiotics and (or) probiotics on indices associated with gut health in humans and dogs.; The first experiment tested the effects of a prebiotic [fructooligosaccharides (FOS)] and (or) a probiotic [Lactobacillus acidophilus (LAC)] on bowel function and fermentative end-product concentrations in adult humans. Prebiotic and probiotic supplementation resulted in minor effects on bowel function. Fructooligosaccharides decreased fecal isovalerate and ammonia concentrations, while LAC increased several fecal putrefactive compounds.; The second experiment tested the effects of a prebiotic (FOS) and (or) probiotic (LAC) on gut microbial populations, fermentative end-product concentrations, and nutrient digestibility by healthy dogs. Fructooligosaccharide supplementation improved gut microbial ecology, increased fecal butyrate and lactate concentrations, and decreased fecal putrefactive compound concentrations. Probiotic supplementation tended to improve gut microbial ecology and total tract nutrient digestibility. However, LAC supplementation increased several fecal putrefactive compounds.; The third experiment tested the effects of two prebiotics [FOS and mannanoligosaccharides (MOS)] on gut microbial populations, fermentative end-product concentrations, immune function, and nutrient digestibility by ileal-cannulated dogs. Fructooligosaccharides decreased concentrations of fecal putrefactive compounds, while MOS tended to increase fecal lactobacilli populations and improve immune capacity.; The fourth experiment tested the effects of FOS and MOS on ileal and fecal microbial populations and immune function in ileal-cannulated dogs. Fructooligosaccharide and MOS supplementation increased concentrations of fecal bifidobacteria, fecal lactobacilli, and ileal lactobacilli. A shift in blood immune cells also was observed.; These experiments demonstrated that prebiotic and (or) probiotic supplementation seems to improve indices associated with gut health of humans and dogs. However, caution should be taken, as LAC supplementation did result in some negative effects (e.g., increased fecal putrefactive compounds). Prebiotic and probiotic supplementation may be most beneficial to dogs with abnormal gut ecology or dogs under high stress conditions.
机译:益生元和益生菌是饮食成分,用于有益地改变肠道中的微生物种群并改善宿主健康。尽管补充这些功能性成分已在几种物种中显示出有益的作用,但在人和狗中的研究很少。因此,这项研究的总体目标是评估补充益生元和(或)益生菌对人和狗肠道健康相关指标的影响。第一个实验测试了益生元[低聚果糖(FOS)]和(或)益生菌[嗜酸乳杆菌(LAC)]对成年人肠道功能和发酵终产物浓度的影响。益生元和益生菌补充剂对肠功能的影响较小。低聚果糖降低粪便中的异戊酸和氨浓度,而LAC则增加几种粪便的腐败化合物。第二个实验测试了益生元(FOS)和(或)益生菌(LAC)对肠道健康的犬肠道微生物种群,发酵终产物浓度和营养物质消化率的影响。低聚果糖的补充改善了肠道微生物的生态,增加了粪便中丁酸和乳酸的浓度,并降低了粪便中腐败性化合物的浓度。补充益生菌倾向于改善肠道微生物生态和总养分消化率。但是,LAC的添加增加了几种粪便腐败化合物。第三个实验测试了两种益生元[FOS和甘露寡糖(MOS)]对肠回肠狗的肠道菌群,发酵终产物浓度,免疫功能和营养消化率的影响。低聚果糖降低粪便腐败化合物的浓度,而MOS倾向于增加粪便乳酸菌的数量并提高免疫能力。第四个实验测试了FOS和MOS对回肠插管狗的回肠和粪便微生物种群和免疫功能的影响。低聚果糖和MOS的添加增加了粪便双歧杆菌,粪便乳杆菌和回肠乳杆菌的浓度。还观察到血液免疫细胞发生了变化。这些实验表明,益生元和(或)益生菌的补充似乎可以改善与人和狗肠道健康相关的指标。但是,应谨慎行事,因为添加LAC确实会带来一些负面影响(例如,粪便中的腐败化合物增加)。益生元和益生菌补充剂可能对肠道生态异常的狗或高压力条件下的狗最有益。

著录项

  • 作者

    Swanson, Kelly Scott.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.;

  • 授予单位 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.;
  • 学科 Health Sciences Nutrition.; Agriculture Animal Culture and Nutrition.; Health Sciences Immunology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2002
  • 页码 215 p.
  • 总页数 215
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 预防医学、卫生学;饲料;预防医学、卫生学;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:46:07

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号