首页> 外文学位 >Inferiority, degeneracy, and dependency: Problematizing the immigrant in social work discourse, 1882--1952.
【24h】

Inferiority, degeneracy, and dependency: Problematizing the immigrant in social work discourse, 1882--1952.

机译:自卑,堕落和依赖:在社会工作话语中对移民提出问题,1882-1952年。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This is a work of discursive history which investigates a particular set of theory-driven questions focused on the representations of immigrants in social work discourse spanning the years 1882 to 1952. The study is founded on a poststructuralist conception of discourse: a contra-modernist, anti-essentialist perspective on language, identity, society, and social practices. Derrida's perspective on language and text provides the theoretical and analytical tools for the deconstructive textual analysis of the social work discourse on immigrants and Foucault's critique of traditional social analysis situates the findings within a broader examination of the constitutive power of a disciplinary discourse.;The study examines three publications: The Proceedings of the National Conference of Social Work, The Survey, and the Social Service Review, which recorded the public views of the leaders of the emerging field of social work. They represent an "elite" discourse---authorized and sanctioned texts---which not only held significant sway in the constitution of the mode and the course of social work with immigrants, but upheld and facilitated the larger political and civic discourse on immigration and immigrants. The year 1882 saw the passage of the Chinese Exclusion Act marking the "beginning" of a period of race-based exclusion, and a general immigration act which expanded the categories of inadmissible aliens begun in 1875, by adding "persons likely to become a public charge." The year 1952 marked the enactment of an immigration act which "eliminated" race as an exclusionary factor but concretized the "National Origins Quota" restrictions introduced in 1924.;Immigrants are problematized in these texts. Whether categorized as the "alien problem," the "foreign problem," the "Americanization problem," the "citizenship problem," the "racial problem," the "refugee problem," the "border problem," or the more specific "Mexican problem," and the "oriental problem," immigrants are conceived as problematic entities whose presence, at best, complicates the smooth operations of the nation-state and, at worst, imperil the physical, material, intellectual, and moral integrity of its society. The cast of characters problematized, the methods of problematization, and the tenor of the voice with which they are problematized change over the years covered; the fact of the problematization does not.
机译:这是一种话语历史研究,研究了一组特定的理论驱动的问题,这些问题着眼于1882年至1952年间社会工作话语中的移民代表。该研究基于后结构主义话语概念:一个反现代主义者,对语言,身份,社会和社会实践的反本质主义观点。德里达的语言和文本视角为对移民的社会工作话语进行解构性的文本分析提供了理论和分析工具,而福柯对传统社会分析的批评则将调查结果置于对纪律话语的构成力的更广泛考察中。审查了三份出版物:《全国社会工作会议录》,《调查》和《社会服务评论》,其中记录了新兴社会工作领域领导人的公众观点。它们代表着一种“精英”话语(经授权和批准的文本),不仅在该模式的构成和与移民的社会工作过程中占据了主导地位,而且维护并促进了有关移民的更大的政治和公民话语和移民。 1882年,《中国排斥法》的通过标志着一段基于种族的排斥的“开始”;一项一般移民法通过增加“可能成为公众的人”,扩大了1875年开始的不可接纳的外国人的类别。收费。” 1952年标志着一项移民法的颁布,该法“消除”了种族作为排他性因素,但具体化了1924年引入的“民族起源配额”限制。这些文本对移民提出了质疑。是归类为“外国人问题”,“外国问题”,“美国化问题”,“公民身份问题”,“种族问题”,“难民问题”,“边界问题”,还是更具体的“墨西哥问题”和“东方问题”被认为是有问题的实体,其存在充其量只会使民族国家的顺利运作复杂化,并且在最坏的情况下会损害其国家的物质,物质,知识和道德完整性社会。在过去的几年中,被问题化的角色的角色,问题化的方法以及被问题化的声音的音调不断变化;问题化的事实并非如此。

著录项

  • 作者

    Park, Yoosun.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Washington.;

  • 授予单位 University of Washington.;
  • 学科 Social work.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2003
  • 页码 248 p.
  • 总页数 248
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号