首页> 外文学位 >Exposing prejudices against a bias: Three essays on short-run biased technical change in macroeconomics.
【24h】

Exposing prejudices against a bias: Three essays on short-run biased technical change in macroeconomics.

机译:揭露偏见的偏见:关于宏观经济学中短期偏见的技术变革的三篇论文。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

I explore the implications of short-run biased technical change for macroeconomics.; A large literature in macroeconomics is concerned with technical change in the short-run (annually or quarterly). However, this literature has focused exclusively on neutral technical change, i.e. that which does not affect factor elasticities.; I demonstrate that the neglect of short-run biased technical change is based on stylized facts of long-run economic growth and necessary conditions on permanent technical change for long-run balanced growth paths to exist in neoclassical growth models. However, observations from data are suggestive of short-run biased technical change, and balanced growth is consistent with short-run biased technical change.; In an SDGE model I find that (i) biased technical changes cause fluctuations that are qualitatively similar to those caused by neutral technical changes, and (ii) small biased technical changes can account output volatility matching the U.S. experience. In a growth accounting framework, using data from 35 U.S. sectors, I find that (iii) if biased technical change occurs, then it contaminates Solow residuals (even when time-varying factor shares are used), and, again, (iv) small biased technical changes can result in economically important effects on value-added growth.; Based on (i)--(iv), I analyze labor's share from the 35 U.S. sectors. Theory suggests that, given certain conditions, factor shares equal factor elasticities, so movements in labor's share may proxy for biased technical change. I find that labor's share movements are rejected as exogenous to instruments correlated with factor demand growth in fewer sectors than Solow residuals are. Also, after removing the portion of labor's share movements explained by growth in the real wage, the real price of capital, and the capital/labor ratio, the residual cannot be rejected as an exogenous impulse in a large majority of U.S. sectors (27 out of 35). The volatilities of these residuals are, on average, 29 percent as volatile as their constituent series.; I conclude that short-run biased technical change does occur; observed factor shares are a starting point to quantify this technical change; and the evidence suggests that short-run biased technical change may have important effects on economic fluctuations.
机译:我探讨了短期偏向技术变革对宏观经济学的影响。大量的宏观经济学文献都涉及短期(每年或每季度)的技术变化。但是,该文献只关注中性技术变化,即不影响要素弹性的变化。我证明了对短期偏见技术变革的忽视是基于长期经济增长的典型事实,以及永久性技术变革的必要条件,以使新古典增长模型中存在长期均衡增长路径。但是,从数据中观察到的结果表明存在短期的技术变化,而均衡的增长与短期的技术变化是一致的。在SDGE模型中,我发现(i)有偏见的技术变化所导致的波动在质量上与中性技术变化所造成的波动相似;(ii)有偏见的技术变化可以说明与美国经验相匹配的产出波动性。在一个增长核算框架中,使用来自35个美国部门的数据,我发现(iii)如果发生了有偏见的技术变化,那么它会污染Solow残差(即使使用时变因子份额),并且再次,(iv)小有偏见的技术变革可能对增值增长产生重要的经济影响。基于(i)-(iv),我分析了美国35个行业的劳动力份额。理论表明,在一定条件下,要素份额具有相等的要素弹性,因此劳动份额的变动可以替代有偏见的技术变革。我发现,与Solow残差相比,劳动力份额变动被视为与要素需求增长相关的工具的外生工具,而该部门与较少部门中的要素需求增长相关。同样,在去除了以实际工资,实际资本价格以及资本/劳动比率的增长所解释的劳动份额变动的一部分之后,剩余的收益就不能被美国绝大多数部门视为外生的冲动(27 35)。这些残留物的挥发度平均为其组成系列的29%。我的结论是,确实存在短期的,有偏见的技术变革。观察到的因子份额是量化此技术变化的起点;有证据表明,短期的,有偏见的技术变革可能会对经济波动产生重要影响。

著录项

  • 作者

    Young, Andrew Thomas.;

  • 作者单位

    Emory University.;

  • 授予单位 Emory University.;
  • 学科 Economics General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2003
  • 页码 153 p.
  • 总页数 153
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 经济学;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:45:50

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号