首页> 外文学位 >Legislating difference: Race, law, and the codification of northern provincial society, 1620--1765.
【24h】

Legislating difference: Race, law, and the codification of northern provincial society, 1620--1765.

机译:立法差异:种族,法律和北部省级社会的法规化,1620--1765年。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation uses the law to reconsider the basis of race relations in the northern colonies of British America from 1620 to 1765. It employs imperial-colonial correspondence, laws, assembly and council journals, and court cases to examine the central role of legal forms in the definition of New World society and its social categories. It argues that the law expressed colonial society's core beliefs and practices, such as freedom, Protestantism, patriarchy, and personal wealth, while also designating who had access to these imperatives and privileges. As the law assumed the power to arbitrate the difficulties of colonial settlement, free and enslaved African Americans, Indians, and multi-racial persons were systematically excluded from key political, religious, economic, and political rights. New laws, which designated free and enslaved people of color as lacking in liberty, prone to anti-Christian behavior, subordinate family members, and akin to moveable property such as farm animals, emerged in the process.; As a result, an exploration into statue law can provide a novel, critical perspective on the nature of racial community in British America. The current trend in scholarship privileges economic, environmental, and demographic factors such as population growth, agricultural development, and capital flow in the formation of racial differences among African, Indian, and European peoples. This project places the dynamics of race relations squarely in the realm of law and politics, arguing that institutional factors of warfare, taxes, and metropolitan incursion were as important to the master-slave relationship as soil quality, climate, and birth rates. Perhaps the most important event to affect the basis of race relations in the northern colonies was the Glorious Revolution. The controversy surrounding the accession of William III to the English throne in 1688 proved a critical turning point in colonial statute law, shaping the way northern colonists viewed their legal priorities and in turn altering the basis of their racial divisions.
机译:本文利用法律重新考虑了1620至1765年英属美国北部殖民地的种族关系基础。它运用了帝国殖民主义,法律,集会和议会日刊以及法院案件,以研究法律形式在中美洲的中心作用。新世界社会的定义及其社会类别。它认为,该法律表达了殖民社会的核心信念和实践,例如自由,新教,父权制和个人财富,同时还指定了谁有权获得这些命令和特权。由于法律承担了解决殖民解决困难的权力,因此自由和被奴役的非洲裔美国人,印第安人和多种族人士被系统地排除在重要的政治,宗教,经济和政治权利之外。在这一过程中出现了新的法律,其中指定了自由和被奴役的有色人种缺乏自由,容易出现反基督教的行为,下属家庭成员,并且类似于动产,例如农场动物。结果,对雕像法的探索可以为英美种族社区的性质提供一种新颖的批判性观点。非洲,印度和欧洲人民之间种族差异的形成,当前的奖学金趋势使经济,环境和人口因素(例如人口增长,农业发展和资本流动)享有特权。该项目认为种族关系的动态正处于法律和政治领域,认为战争,税收和大都市的入侵等制度因素对主奴关系同土壤质量,气候和出生率一样重要。影响北部殖民地种族关系基础的最重要事件也许是光荣革命。 1688年威廉三世登上英国王位的争议证明了殖民法规的一个关键转折点,它塑造了北部殖民者看待其法律优先事项的方式,进而改变了种族划分的基础。

著录项

  • 作者

    Allegro, James Joseph.;

  • 作者单位

    The Johns Hopkins University.;

  • 授予单位 The Johns Hopkins University.;
  • 学科 History United States.; Law.; History Black.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2003
  • 页码 333 p.
  • 总页数 333
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 美洲史;法律;非洲史;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号