首页> 外文学位 >Art education in American Indian boarding schools: Tool of assimilation, tool of resistance.
【24h】

Art education in American Indian boarding schools: Tool of assimilation, tool of resistance.

机译:美洲印第安人寄宿学校的艺术教育:同化工具,抵抗工具。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation examines the process of domestication of American Indian children in government-controlled schools through art education. At the end of the nineteenth century, Thomas J. Morgan, Commissioner of Indian Affairs (1889-1893), and Estelle Reel, Superintendent of Indian schools (1898-1910), brought changes to the curriculum of Indian schools by introducing the teaching of elementary art and instruction in "Native industries" such as pottery, weaving, and basketry. I claim that art education was as an instrument for the 'colonization of consciousness,' that is, for the redefinition of Indigenous peoples' minds through the instilment of values and ideals of mainstream society and thus for the maintenance of a political, economic, social, and racial hierarchy. Art education served the needs of the late-nineteenth century assimilationist agenda.;I consider Morgan's and Reel's national mandates at the turn of the twentieth century and examine their rationales for including drawing and Native crafts in the Indian schools' curriculum. This knowledge of educational programs crafted at the bureaucratic level is applied to an analysis of art instruction in two selected institutions, the Albuquerque Indian School in New Mexico and the Sherman Institute in Riverside, California, from 1889 to 1917. I examine local responses to government policies and daily practices of Indian education at the micro level in order to provide specific information as to the organization, structure, and pedagogy of art instruction within a school day in these particular localities. Finally, I discuss how students' artworks were displayed in the context of exhibitions and national conventions as exemplary evidence of the progress toward civilization, but also of the instrumentality of an Anglo education in reaching this goal. As Indian policy changed, so did the art curriculum of Indian schools; while drawing continued until the mid-1910s Native arts and crafts began to disappear and were eventually discontinued. As activities that promoted independence and individual creativity, they began to undermine the government's agenda. From the early 1890s when it was first introduced into Indian schools to the mid-1910s when it lost its significance, art education was a tool for the assertion of America's hegemonic power.
机译:本文探讨了通过艺术教育在政府控制的学校中驯化印第安印第安儿童的过程。十九世纪末,印度事务专员托马斯·J·摩根(Thomas J. Morgan)(1889-1893)和印度学校总监埃斯特尔·雷尔(Estelle Reel)(1898-1910)通过介绍印度教的教学方法,改变了印度学校的课程设置。 “本地工业”中的基本艺术和教学,例如陶艺,编织和编织品。我声称艺术教育是“意识殖民化”的工具,也就是说,是通过灌输主流社会的价值观和理想来重新定义土著人民的思想,从而维护政治,经济,社会的和种族等级。美术教育满足了19世纪后期同化议程的需要。我考虑了20世纪初摩根和雷尔的国家规定,并研究了将绘画和土特产手工艺品纳入印度学校课程的理由。在官僚级别上制作的教育计划知识将用于对两个选定机构的艺术指导进行分析,这两个机构分别是1889年至1917年在新墨西哥州的阿尔伯克基印第安人学校和加利福尼亚州里弗赛德的谢尔曼学院。我考察了当地对政府的回应印度教育的微观政策和日常实践,以便在这些特殊地区的教学日内提供有关艺术指导的组织,结构和教学法的特定信息。最后,我讨论了如何在展览会和民族大会的背景下展示学生的作品,以作为文明进步的典范证据,同时也是盎格鲁教育实现这一目标的工具。随着印度政策的变化,印度学校的艺术课程也发生了变化。绘画一直持续到1910年代中期,当地的手工艺品开始消失,并最终停产。作为促进独立性和个人创造力的活动,它们开始破坏政府的议程。从1890年代初期(最初在印度学校引入)到1910年代中期(失去其重要性),艺术教育一直是维护美国霸权的工具。

著录项

  • 作者

    Lentis, Marinella.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Arizona.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Arizona.;
  • 学科 Native American studies.;Art education.;Education history.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 576 p.
  • 总页数 576
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号