首页> 外文学位 >Is education a fundamental right requiring federal constitutional protection?
【24h】

Is education a fundamental right requiring federal constitutional protection?

机译:教育是一项需要联邦宪法保护的基本权利吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The primary purpose of this study is to examine the sources of educational inequity and whether a constitutional amendment, and therefore greater federal role, would positively affect the quality of education provided. Since the Constitution is designed to protect the rights of the individual and preserve the elements necessary for a democracy, does education have a place in the Constitution? It is the intention of the study to prove that the answer to this question is yes. Not only is education in and of itself a fundamental right, its existence is necessary for the practicing of other constitutionally protected rights. Because it is necessary for the practice of liberty and the recognition of human dignity, a basic right to education should be established. The federal government has historically intervened when states have acted in a manner that violates the Constitution. Were there an education amendment, the federal government would have the justification to intervene when state actions lead to the denial of equal educational opportunity. Therefore, it is necessary within the study to examine specific actions taken by the state that result in unequal educational opportunities. The final purpose of the dissertation is to assess how the current parameters of education would change within the presence of an education amendment. What positive changes are likely to result and how would the decisions and actions of the judicial and legislative branches be affected by the adoption of an education amendment? The chapters presented establish the criteria of basic right and how education satisfies that criteria. A discussion of federalism and an analysis of state action in reference to maintaining educational institutions are included in order to justify the need for a greater federal role. The limitations of the Supreme Court in protecting educational opportunity and the likely influence of an amendment on its role are explored. A proposed amendment protecting education, its political feasibility, and policy implications conclude the study.
机译:这项研究的主要目的是研究教育不平等的根源,以及宪法修正案以及由此产生的更大的联邦角色是否会对所提供的教育质量产生积极影响。由于《宪法》旨在保护个人权利并保留民主所需的要素,因此教育是否在《宪法》中占有一席之地?该研究的目的是证明该问题的答案是肯定的。教育不仅本身是一项基本权利,而且其存在对于实践其他受宪法保护的权利也是必要的。由于实行自由和承认人的尊严是必要的,因此应确立基本的受教育权。历史上,当州采取违反宪法的行为时,联邦政府会进行干预。如果有一项教育修正案,则当州的行动导致剥夺平等的教育机会时,联邦政府将有理由进行干预。因此,有必要在研究中研究导致不平等教育机会的国家采取的具体行动。论文的最终目的是评估在存在教育修正案的情况下当前的教育参数将如何变化。通过教育修正案可能会带来哪些积极变化,司法和立法部门的决定和行动将如何受到影响?介绍的各章确定了基本权利的标准以及教育如何满足该标准。为了证明有必要发挥更大的联邦作用,对联邦制进行了讨论,并就维护教育机构的问题对国家行为进行了分析。探索了最高法院在保护教育机会方面的局限性,以及修正案对其作用的可能影响。拟议的一项保护教育的修正案,其政治可行性和政策含义结束了研究。

著录项

  • 作者

    Anthony, Jessica I.;

  • 作者单位

    Columbia University Teachers College.;

  • 授予单位 Columbia University Teachers College.;
  • 学科 Education Administration.; Education Philosophy of.
  • 学位 Ed.D.
  • 年度 2003
  • 页码 210 p.
  • 总页数 210
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 教育;教育;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号