首页> 外文学位 >Bispectral analysis and motor activity assessment scores in mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit.
【24h】

Bispectral analysis and motor activity assessment scores in mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit.

机译:重症监护室机械通气患者的双谱分析和运动活动评估评分。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Objectives. The purpose of this study is to determine the correlation between Motor Activity Assessment Scale (MAAS) and Bispectral Analysis (BIS) scores following a sedation protocol utilized for mechanically ventilated ICU patients.; Methods. After IRB approval, 30 adult mechanically ventilated ICU patients undergoing sedation protocol were enrolled in a descriptive, prospective, observational investigation. Surrogate consent was obtained. Repeated measures design was used with hourly MAAS and 750 blinded BIS values recorded simultaneously for a continuous 24-hour period. Hourly MAAS scores for this period were obtained from staff nurses' charting. Demographic data was also obtained from patients' clinical charts. Descriptive and correlation statistical approaches were used.; Results. The sample had a mean age of 63 +/− 16.32 years; 63% were male and 37% were female; 40% were medicine patients and 60% were surgical patients. For each MAAS group, an overall mean BIS was calculated. Linear regression determined that there was a strong (R2 = 0.93, p .0001) correlation between BIS and each MAAS group. Sub-group analysis of sedation practices between surgical (R2 = 0.93, p .0001) and medicine (R2 = 0.75, p .0001) groups demonstrated a difference between BIS and MAAS scores when evaluating under-sedation, ideal sedation and over-sedation. BIS scores were more accurate in determining sedation levels.; Conclusions. MAAS and BIS are effective tools for determining level of sedation in mechanically ventilated ICU patients. The correlation between subjective MAAS and objective BIS scales varied in medical and surgical patients with BIS being more accurate.
机译:目标。本研究的目的是确定用于机械通气ICU患者的镇静方案后的运动活动评估量表(MAAS)与双光谱分析(BIS)评分之间的相关性。 方法。在IRB批准后,对30例接受镇静方案的成人机械通气ICU患者进行了描述性,前瞻性和观察性研究。已获得代理人同意。重复测量设计用于每小时24小时的MAAS,同时记录750个BIS盲值。该时间段的每小时MAAS得分是从职员护士的图表中获得的。人口统计学数据也从患者的临床图表中获得。使用描述性和相关性统计方法。 结果。样本的平均年龄为63 +/- 16.32岁;男性63%,女性37%;内科患者占40%,外科患者占60%。对于每个MAAS组,计算了总体平均BIS。线性回归确定BIS与每个MAAS组之间存在很强的相关性(R 2 = 0.93,p <.0001)。手术组(R 2 = 0.93,p <.0001)和药物治疗组(R 2 = 0.75,p <.0001)的镇静方法亚组分析表明在评估镇静不足,理想镇静和过度镇静时,BIS和MAAS评分之间的差异。 BIS评分在确定镇静水平时更为准确。 结论。 MAAS和BIS是确定机械通气ICU患者镇静水平的有效工具。在医学和外科手术患者中,主观MAAS与客观BIS量表之间的相关性有所不同,其中BIS更准确。

著录项

  • 作者

    Burkard, Joseph F.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Tennessee Center for the Health Sciences.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Tennessee Center for the Health Sciences.;
  • 学科 Health Sciences Nursing.; Health Sciences Health Care Management.
  • 学位 D.N.Sc.
  • 年度 2003
  • 页码 52 p.
  • 总页数 52
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 预防医学、卫生学;预防医学、卫生学;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:45:33

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号