首页> 外文学位 >Analysis of load tests on drilled shafts in the Beaumont Formation and the Lissie Formation in the Texas Gulf Coast.
【24h】

Analysis of load tests on drilled shafts in the Beaumont Formation and the Lissie Formation in the Texas Gulf Coast.

机译:德克萨斯州墨西哥湾沿岸Beaumont组和Lissie组的钻探井的载荷试验分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Safe and economical design of foundations including deep foundations such as drilled shafts is vital for transportation and infrastructure development sectors. Use of rational prediction methods to determine the total capacity of drilled shafts has undergone appreciable changes in the last three decades. These methods have been verified by full-scale field load tests on instrumented drilled shafts. However, these load tests are prohibitively expensive to perform on a routine basis for design purposes. Empirical and semi-empirical methods based on principles of soil mechanics have been developed for design of drilled shafts. Such methods utilize the observations during soil exploration and the results of laboratory testing. Nevertheless, the prediction of total foundation capacity using the existing methods varies in different geological conditions. Moreover, the existing prediction methods provide conservative shaft capacity in the Texas Gulf Coast resulting in costly foundation construction involving material resources, time, and money.; In the present study, a local database comprising 31 full-scale load tests performed on drilled shafts in the Beaumont Formation and the Lissie Formation in the Texas Gulf Coast has been compiled. Based on the most recent information on load transfer behavior of drilled shafts in cohesive and cohesionless soils, a rational failure criterion was used to determine the total foundation capacity for each test shaft from its load-displacement curve. Average undrained shear strength along the shaft in clay strata and Standard Penetration Test (SPT) blow count (SPT N values) along the shaft in sand strata were used to predict both the side resistance and the base resistance for each test shaft. The widely used Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) method was used to predict the total shaft capacity, side resistance, and base resistance for comparative purposes.; Revised values of alpha-factor and beta-factor are proposed to predict the capacity of drilled shafts based on the results of the load tests for the local geologic conditions. Calculated shaft capacity using these revised values was compared with the capacity obtained using the FHWA method, used frequently for the design of the drilled shafts. These calculated shaft capacities were compared with the interpreted total shaft capacity from the actual field load test results. Statistical analysis of the local database was performed using the least squares linear regression analysis.
机译:安全和经济的基础设计,包括诸如钻孔竖井之类的深层基础,对于运输和基础设施开发部门至关重要。在过去的三十年中,使用合理的预测方法确定钻孔轴的总容量已发生了可观的变化。这些方法已通过在仪器化的钻孔轴上进行的全面现场负载测试得到了验证。但是,出于设计目的,按常规执行这些负载测试非常昂贵。已经开发了基于土壤力学原理的经验和半经验方法来设计井筒。这种方法利用了土壤勘探过程中的观察结果和实验室测试的结果。然而,使用现有方法对总地基承载力的预测在不同的地质条件下会有所不同。此外,现有的预测方法在德克萨斯州墨西哥湾沿岸提供了保守的竖井承载能力,导致了涉及材料,时间和金钱的昂贵基础建设。在本研究中,已经汇编了一个本地数据库,其中包括对德克萨斯州墨西哥湾沿岸的博蒙特组和利西组的钻探井进行的31次满负荷试验。基于有关黏性和非黏性土壤中钻杆荷载传递行为的最新信息,使用合理的破坏准则从其荷载-位移曲线确定每个试验杆的总地基承载力。沿粘土地层竖井的平均不排水抗剪强度和沿沙地层竖井的标准渗透试验(SPT)打击计数(SPT N值)被用来预测每个试验竖井的侧阻力​​和基础阻力。出于比较目的,使用了广泛使用的联邦公路管理局(FHWA)方法来预测轴的总容量,侧向阻力和基础阻力。建议根据当地地质条件的载荷测试结果,修改α系数和β系数的值来预测钻探井的能力。将使用这些修正值计算出的轴容量与使用FHWA方法获得的容量进行比较,该方法经常用于钻探轴的设计。将这些计算得出的轴容量与实际现场负载测试结果中解释的总轴容量进行比较。使用最小二乘线性回归分析进行本地数据库的统计分析。

著录项

  • 作者

    Dass, Raghunath.;

  • 作者单位

    Southern Illinois University at Carbondale.;

  • 授予单位 Southern Illinois University at Carbondale.;
  • 学科 Engineering Civil.; Geotechnology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2003
  • 页码 234 p.
  • 总页数 234
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 建筑科学;地质学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号