首页> 外文学位 >Evaluating the ASCE standardized Penman-Monteith equation and developing crop coefficients of alfalfa using a weighing lysimeter in southeast Colorado.
【24h】

Evaluating the ASCE standardized Penman-Monteith equation and developing crop coefficients of alfalfa using a weighing lysimeter in southeast Colorado.

机译:在科罗拉多州东南部,使用称重溶度计评估ASCE标准化的Penman-Monteith方程并开发苜蓿的作物系数。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Quantification and efficient irrigation application of crop water requirements are potential ways for water resources conservation and sustainability. Reference evapotranspiration (ETref) is a very important variable in the quantification of crop water requirement. The ASCE standardized ETref equation has been recommended recently for calculating ETref. However it has not been tested under Colorado conditions. In addition, crop coefficients (Kc) for use with the ASCE standardized reference ET equation have not been developed in Colorado. Crop coefficients that have been used by the Colorado Division of Water Resources were estimated from Kimberly, Idaho and Bushland, Texas even though the growing conditions such as soil, elevation, climate and environmental factors in Colorado are different than in Kimberly and Bushland. They were developed using reference ET equations other than the ASCE standardized PM ETref equation and later they were adapted for use with the ASCE standardized PM ETref equation (Allen et al., 2007).;The objectives of this study were to test the performance of the ASCE standardized ETref equation for calculating alfalfa reference ET under southeast Colorado conditions and to develop compatible crop coefficients of alfalfa that apply to the region. A corollary objective was to determine if the full version of the Penman-Monteith equation could better match measured alfalfa ET from the lysimeter when reference conditions were satisfied.;A precise weighing lysimeter was used to measure alfalfa ET and to develop crop coefficients of alfalfa at Rocky Ford in Southeast Colorado. The lysimeter was filled with a 3 m x 3 m x 2.4 m undisturbed soil monolith and alfalfa (Genoa variety) was planted in the lysimeter and in 4 ha of surrounding field in August 2007. Alfalfa was harvested four times in each of the 2008, 2009 and 2010 growing seasons. ETref was calculated using the hourly ASCE standardized PM ETrs (standardized reference evapotranspiration for tall reference crop) and full version Penman-Monteith equations using climate data from an automatic weather station installed at the lysimeter site. Crop coefficients of alfalfa were calculated by dividing daily measured ET from the lysimeter by the corresponding daily ASCE standardized reference ET.;Season total alfalfa ET from the lysimeter ranged from 1179 mm to 1455 mm. Maximum daily water use of alfalfa was around 14.4 mm/day in 2010 season due to relatively high maximum temperature, high solar radiation and high wind speed. Average daily ET for 2008, 2009 and 2010 was 5.7 mm/day, 6.0 mm/day and 6.9 mm/day, respectively.;Hourly calculated ETrs values agreed well with measured ET from the lysimeter whenever alfalfa was under reference conditions (height of at least 50 cm and no soil water stress). Residuals between calculated ETrs and measured lysimeter ET increased as air temperature increased and as relative humidity decreased. Greater residuals were obtained when 80 % of the footprint length was not in the field. During some periods, there was lack of adequate fetch and this contributed to greater differences between the ASCE standardized ETrs and lysimeter ET. Good agreement between ASCE standardized ETrs and lysimeter ET was obtained when at least 80% of the ET flux footprint was inside the alfalfa field.;The alfalfa growth stage, climate, precipitation and soil water content were major factors that shaped the crop coefficient curves. The first cutting cycle, which had slower growth due to cooler weather, had smaller crop coefficients, whereas later cutting cycles with rapid growth had larger crop coefficients. The maximum crop coefficients were below 1.2 in 2008 (water stressed) and at or slightly above 1.2 in 2009 and 2010. The Kcr values greater than 1.0 were due to ETc from the lysimeter being greater than ETrs from ASCE standardized PM. Periods when alfalfa in the lysimeter was taller than alfalfa in the immediate surroundings and when the canopy extended outside the lysimeter boundary (3 m x 3 m) contributed to Kcr values greater than 1.0. Precipitation interception by the alfalfa canopy increased evaporation and caused outliers in the crop coefficient values. Crop coefficients were greatly affected by soil water content. A reduction in the alfalfa crop coefficients was observed at the end of some cutting cycles that coincided with reductions in soil water content.;The average leaf area index (LAI) at a height of 50 cm was 4.34 m 2/m2 and there was a high correlation between LAI and alfalfa height with R2 of 0.94, but the relationships were not the same as suggested by Allen et al. (1994). ETref values calculated by the full version of the Penman-Monteith equation deviated more from the lysimeter ET compared to the ASCE standardized ETref equation.;Full version of Penman Monteith showed very good agreement with ASCE standardized ET. Using the full version of the Penman-Monteith equation did not improve agreement with lysimeter ET at reference conditions.
机译:作物需水量的量化和有效灌溉应用是水资源节约和可持续性的潜在途径。参考蒸发蒸腾量(ETref)是量化作物需水量的重要变量。最近已推荐使用ASCE标准化ETref公式来计算ETref。但是,尚未在科罗拉多州的条件下进行过测试。此外,科罗拉多州尚未开发出与ASCE标准化参考ET方程配合使用的作物系数(Kc)。尽管科罗拉多州的土壤,海拔,气候和环境因素等生长条件不同于金伯利和布什兰德,但科罗拉多州水资源司使用的作物系数是从德克萨斯州爱达荷州金伯利和布什兰德估算得出的。它们是使用ASCE标准化PM ETref方程以外的参考ET方程开发的,后来又与ASCE标准化PM ETref方程一起使用(Allen et al。,2007)。 ASCE标准化ETref方程,用于计算科罗拉多州东南部条件下的苜蓿参考ET,并开发适用于该地区的兼容苜蓿作物系数。一个推论的目的是确定满足参考条件时Penman-Monteith方程的完整版本是否能更好地匹配溶渗仪中测得的苜蓿ET .;使用精确的称重溶渗仪测量苜蓿ET并开发苜蓿ET的作物系数在东南科罗拉多的岩石福特。溶菌仪中充满了3 mx 3 mx 2.4 m的原状土壤块,并于2007年8月在溶菌仪和周围4公顷的田地中种植了苜蓿(热那亚变种)。2008、2009和2009年分别收获了四次2010年生长季节。 ETref是使用每小时ASCE标准化PM ETrs(高参考作物的标准化参考蒸散量)和完整版Penman-Monteith公式,使用安装在溶渗仪现场的自动气象站的气候数据来计算的。苜蓿的作物系数通过将测干仪的每日测得的ET除以相应的每日ASCE标准化参考ET得出;测厚仪的季节总苜蓿ET的范围为1179 mm至1455 mm。由于相对较高的最高温度,较高的太阳辐射和较高的风速,2010年苜蓿的最大每日用水量约为14.4毫米/天。 2008年,2009年和2010年的日平均ET分别为5.7毫米/天,6.0毫米/天和6.9毫米/天;无论何时,苜蓿在参考条件下(小时高度为至少50厘米,没有土壤水分胁迫)。随着空气温度的升高和相对湿度的降低,计算得出的ETrs与测渗仪ET之间的残差增加。当占地长度的80%不在现场时,会获得更大的残留量。在某些时期,缺乏足够的获取,这导致了ASCE标准化ETrs和溶血仪ET之间的更大差异。当至少有80%的ET通量足迹在苜蓿田中时,ASCE标准化ETrs与蒸渗仪ET达成了良好的协议。苜蓿的生长期,气候,降水和土壤水分是影响作物系数曲线的主要因素。由于天气转凉,生长较慢的第一个采伐周期的作物系数较小,而生长较快的后期采伐周期的作物系数较大。最大作物系数在2008年(水分胁迫)低于1.2,在2009年和2010年达到或略高于1.2。Kcr值大于1.0是由于溶菌仪的ETc大于ASCE标准化PM的ETrs。溶血仪中的苜蓿比周围环境中的苜蓿高并且冠层延伸到溶菌仪边界(3 m x 3 m)之外的时期导致Kcr值大于1.0。苜蓿冠层截留的降水增加了蒸发,并导致了作物系数值的异常。作物系数受土壤水分的影响很大。在某些伐木周期结束时,苜蓿作物系数降低,这与土壤含水量降低相吻合;; 50 cm高度的平均叶面积指数(LAI)为4.34 m 2 / m2,并且LAI与苜蓿高度之间的高度相关性,R2为0.94,但这种关系与Allen等人的建议不同。 (1994)。与ASCE标准化ETref方程相比,完整版Penman-Monteith方程计算的ETref值与溶渗仪ET的偏差更大。; Penman Monteith的完整版本与ASCE标准化ET具有很好的一致性。在参考条件下,使用完整版的Penman-Monteith方程并不能提高与溶渗仪ET的一致性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Al Wahaibi, Hamdan Salem.;

  • 作者单位

    Colorado State University.;

  • 授予单位 Colorado State University.;
  • 学科 Agriculture Soil Science.;Economics Agricultural.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 155 p.
  • 总页数 155
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号