首页> 外文学位 >Emerson, Macy, and the evolution of participatory epistemology .
【24h】

Emerson, Macy, and the evolution of participatory epistemology .

机译:艾默生,梅西和参与式认识论的发展。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Characterizing Ralph Waldo Emerson and Joanna Macy as participatory epistemologists, and comparing them in this light, requires that their writings be contextualized within the ontological framework of the contemporary participatory literature. Focusing particularly on the participatory response to the Cartesian world view, and examining the alternative offered in its stead, underscores the evolving themes in participatory thought during the century and a half from Emerson's time to Macy's. Emphasizing the primary role of participatory mind as an epistemological alternative to Descartes's transcendental thinker, accentuates the magnitude of the shift participatory thinkers offer.;This comparison of Emerson and Macy, in the context of the contemporary participatory literature, uncovers the history of an evolving participatory world view. Simultaneously, this research argues that Emerson and Macy contribute significantly to the body of participatory thought, with their similar commitment to the importance of nondual experience as a source of knowledge. Finally, this dissertation demonstrates that Emerson and Macy reconceive epistemology in a participatory context, and by identifying nondual experience as a normative locus of knowing, offer an alternative to Cartesian rationalism and mind-body dualism.
机译:要把拉尔夫·沃尔多·爱默生和乔安娜·梅西描述为参与式认识论者,并以此为依据进行比较,就需要在当代参与性文学的本体论框架内对他们的著作进行语境化。特别关注对笛卡尔世界观的参与式回应,并研究替代性地提出的替代方式,强调了从艾默生(Emerson)到梅西(Macy)的一个半世纪以来参与式思想不断发展的主题。强调参与思想是笛卡尔超验思想家的认识论替代的主要作用,强调了参与思想家所提供的转变的幅度。在当代参与文学的背景下,艾默生和梅西的这种比较揭示了演进中的参与思想的历史。世界观。同时,这项研究认为,爱默生和梅西百货对参与式思想体系做出了重要贡献,他们对非双重经验作为知识来源的重要性也做出了类似的承诺。最后,本文证明了爱默生和梅西在参与性背景下重新认识了认识论,并通过将非对偶经验确定为认识的规范性场所,为笛卡尔理性主义和心身二元论提供了替代方法。

著录项

  • 作者

    Meacham, Elizabeth E.;

  • 作者单位

    California Institute of Integral Studies.;

  • 授予单位 California Institute of Integral Studies.;
  • 学科 Religion Philosophy of.;Philosophy of Science.;Environmental Philosophy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 210 p.
  • 总页数 210
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号