首页> 外文学位 >An empirical analysis of alternative explanations for the female wage gap.
【24h】

An empirical analysis of alternative explanations for the female wage gap.

机译:对女性工资差距的其他解释的实证分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The social sciences have four explanations for the gender wage gap: preference, crowding, power, and socialization. Neoclassical economists explain the wage gap as the result of employers and employees' work-related preferences. Crowding theorists argue the wage gap is caused by women crowding into a small number of occupations. Power theorists contend men use their socioeconomic superiority to maintain a two-tier wage system that discriminates against women. Socialization theorists note women's secondary status in the labor markets is a result of lifelong socialization processes. Previous econometric research has mostly overlooked the power explanation. Crowding researchers have also not examined the crowding hypothesis over the entire post-World War II era, choosing instead to focus on one particular year or a few years; this research decision is made even though women were continually increasing their share of the labor force throughout the postwar era.;The purpose of this study is to address the two mentioned shortcomings. A wage model is constructed with controls for compensating differentials, power, and female crowding. The model is fitted on male and female workers who were employed in 103 occupations; the 103 occupations were selected because their categorizations have remained consistent between 1950 and 2008. Approximately 30 percent of male workers and 40 percent of female workers are employed in the 103 selected occupations. The robustness of the wage model is tested on ten time-sensitive Census and American Community Survey PUMS.;The study finds supporting evidence for the power and crowding explanations. Male workers earn wage premiums when employed in occupations with high degree of collective bargaining whereas women receive wage penalties. Women also receive no premiums in occupations with apprenticeship requirement until 1990, even though their presence in these occupations has not changed between 1950 and 2008. Also, men and women employed in female-crowded occupations receive wage penalties in every surveyed postwar year, but women are more likely to be employed in female-crowded occupations than their male counterparts.
机译:社会科学对性别工资差距有四种解释:偏好,拥挤,权力和社会化。新古典经济学家解释了工资差距是雇主和雇员与工作相关的偏好的结果。拥挤的理论家认为,工资差距是由妇女从事少量职业引起的。权力理论家认为,男人利用他们的社会经济优势来维持歧视女性的两级工资制度。社会化理论家指出,妇女在劳动力市场中的次要地位是终身社会化进程的结果。先前的计量经济学研究大多忽略了功效解释。拥挤的研究人员也没有研究整个第二次世界大战之后的拥挤假设,而是选择专注于某一年或几年。即使在整个战后时代,妇女在劳动力中的份额不断增加,也做出了这项研究决定。这项研究的目的是解决上述两个缺点。建立了带有补偿差额,权力和女性拥挤的控制的工资模型。该模型适用于受雇于103个职业的男女工人;之所以选择这103个职业,是因为其类别在1950年至2008年之间保持一致。在所选择的103个职业中,大约30%的男性工人和40%的女性工人被雇用。工资模型的鲁棒性在十个对时间敏感的人口普查和美国社区调查PUMS上进行了测试。该研究发现了有力的证据和拥挤的解释。在集体谈判程度高的职业中工作时,男性工人获得工资溢价,而女性则受到工资罚款。妇女在有学徒要求的职业中也不会获得保费,直到1990年为止,即使她们在这些职业中的存在在1950年至2008年之间没有变化。此外,在女性参与的职业中受雇的男女在战后的每个调查年度都受到工资罚款,但妇女与男性同等职业相比,女性更可能从事女性拥挤的职业。

著录项

  • 作者

    Pham, Xuan.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Missouri - Kansas City.;

  • 授予单位 University of Missouri - Kansas City.;
  • 学科 Womens Studies.;Sociology Industrial and Labor Relations.;Gender Studies.;Economics Labor.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 161 p.
  • 总页数 161
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:45:12

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号