首页> 外文学位 >Responses to Reagan: An analysis of Congressional reactions to administration attempts to eliminate agencies.
【24h】

Responses to Reagan: An analysis of Congressional reactions to administration attempts to eliminate agencies.

机译:对里根的回应:国会对行政部门消灭机构的反应的分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation examines tools Congress has to respond to a powerful Chief Executive. Specifically, this research uses congressional documents, including hearings and legislation, to trace the histories of 14 agencies that President Reagan sought to eliminate. I analyze the actions Congress took---or did not take---to save, modify, or kill the agencies and examine the tools it used through the lens of retrenchment theory (Pierson, 1994; Hacker, 2005).;The project uses congressional hearings in two ways. First, it tallies the number of hearings at which each agency was mentioned between January 1, 1981 and January 20, 1989. The analysis then examines the substance of each hearing, paragraph by paragraph to create a dataset that quantifies the tenor of each comment about the survival of each of the 14 case agencies. The result is a databank of 347 hearings and another of 2,075 mentions of the future of the case agencies. The research found 354 mentions of the case agencies in legislation that was introduced between January 1, 1981 and January 20, 1989.;Applying this data to the 14 cases, I find that the number of hearings or pieces of legislation that mention a case agency had little effect on agency survival. What does matter, however, is whether legislation enacted is appropriations legislation or oversight/reauthorization. Agencies that receive appropriations are likely to survive the Administration without modification. Agencies that were discussed at more hearings were likely to be modified because hearings opened up arenas for debate and compromise.;The case studies also demonstrated that Congress used a variety of methods to implement its policy preferences. Tools and actions that Jacob Hacker attributed to executive branch use, like drift, conversion, and layering, are used by the legislative branch to save or modify an agency and ensure its survival. Moreover, Congress often uses earmarks and limitations on appropriations to protect an agency from Administration attempts to cause drift, conversion, and layering. Congress can use its constitutionally provided authorities to legislate, oversee, and appropriate executive-branch operations to thwart the designs of presidents who enter office in eras of high presidential power.
机译:本文研究了国会为回应强大的行政首长而必须采取的手段。具体而言,这项研究使用包括听证会和立法在内的国会文件来追踪里根总统试图消除的14个机构的历史。我分析了国会为挽救,修改或杀死代理机构而采取或未采取的行动,并通过裁员理论研究了其所使用的工具(Pierson,1994; Hacker,2005)。通过两种方式使用国会听证会。首先,它计算了1981年1月1日至1989年1月20日之间提到每个代理机构的听证次数。然后,该分析逐段检查了每个听证会的实质内容,以创建一个数据集,该数据集量化了有关14个案例机构各自的生存率。结果是数据库包含347场听证会,另外2,075则提及了案件代理机构的未来。研究发现,在1981年1月1日至1989年1月20日之间引入的立法中提到了354个案件代理机构;将该数据应用于14个案件,我发现提到一个案件代理机构的听证或立法数量对代理机构的生存影响很小。然而,重要的是颁布的法律是拨款立法还是监督/重新授权。收到拨款的机构很可能在行政当局不作任何修改的情况下存活下来。在更多的听证会上讨论的机构可能会被修改,因为听证会为讨论和妥协开辟了舞台。案例研究还表明,国会采用了多种方法来实施其政策偏好。立法部门使用Jacob Hacker归因于行政部门使用的工具和行动,例如漂移,转换和分层,以保存或修改代理机构并确保其生存。而且,国会经常在拨款中使用专项拨款和限制拨款,以保护机构免受政府试图造成漂移,转换和分层的企图。国会可以利用其宪法规定的权力来立法,监督和适当的行政分支机构运作,以制止在上任总统权力时代就职的总统的设计。

著录项

  • 作者

    Ginsberg, Wendy.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Pennsylvania.;

  • 授予单位 University of Pennsylvania.;
  • 学科 Political Science General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 194 p.
  • 总页数 194
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号