首页> 外文学位 >Essays on Communication Games with Multiple Informants and Their Applications to Legal Systems.
【24h】

Essays on Communication Games with Multiple Informants and Their Applications to Legal Systems.

机译:关于多信息通信游戏的论文及其在法律体系中的应用。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Chapter 1 studies the properties of the two most commonly used legal institutions, the inquisitorial system and the adversarial system. In the former, the decision maker takes a decision based on her own acquired information, whereas under the latter the decision maker requires the advocates to present their acquired information prior to making a decision. When information is both verifiable and costly to collect, I show that the decision maker expects to make fewer decision making errors in the adversarial system than in the inquisitorial system. The main factor behind this result is that the advocate with the burden of proof values information more and, consequently, works harder to collect information under the adversarial system than the impartial decision maker under the inquisitorial system. This larger effort exerted by the advocates leads to more informed decision making under the adversarial system in spite of the advocates' incentives to distort information.;Chapter 2 studies the problem of an uninformed decision maker who acquires expert advice prior to making a decision. I show that it is less costly to hire partisan agents than impartial agents, especially under advocacy, and that the decision maker prefers partisan advocacy to other forms of institutions. I also extend the literature, originating with Dewatripont and Tirole (1999), to a setting with contracts that condition on information provided and not just the decision made.;Chapter 3 studies the robustness of fully revealing equilibria (FRE) in multidimension-multisender cheap talk games. A FRE is outcome-robust (strategy-robust) if there is an equilibrium whose outcome (strategy) is close to the FRE outcome (strategy) when the noise in senders' observations is small. I show that there is no outcome-robust FRE in the model of Levy and Razin (2007), and discuss the connections between these new notions of robustness and the existing stability concepts studied in the literature.
机译:第1章研究了两种最常用的法律制度的性质,即询问制度和对抗制度。在前者中,决策者根据自己获取的信息做出决定,而在后者中,决策者要求倡导者在做出决定之前先介绍其获取的信息。当信息既可核查又收集成本高昂时,我表明决策者希望在对抗性系统中比在询问性系统中做出更少的决策错误。此结果背后的主要因素是,举证者承担的举证责任比信息查询系统下的公正决策者更加重视信息,因此,在对抗系统下收集信息的工作更加努力。尽管倡导者鼓励扭曲信息,但倡导者付出的更大努力导致在对抗系统下做出更明智的决策。第二章研究了一个不知情的决策者在做出决策之前会获得专家建议的问题。我证明,雇用党派代理人要比公正代理人便宜,尤其是在倡导下,决策者更喜欢党派拥护而不是其他形式的机构。我还把源于Dewatripont和Tirole(1999)的文献扩展到一个合同,该合同以提供的信息为条件,而不仅仅是以做出的决定为条件。第3章研究了充分展现均衡(FRE)在多维多方廉价交易中的稳健性谈话游戏。如果发件人的观察结果中的噪声较小,那么如果均衡的结果(策略)接近FRE结果(策略),则FRE是结果稳健的(策略鲁棒的)。我证明在Levy和Razin(2007)的模型中没有结局稳健的FRE,并讨论了这些新的稳健性概念与文献中研究的现有稳定性概念之间的联系。

著录项

  • 作者

    Kim, Chulyoung.;

  • 作者单位

    University of California, San Diego.;

  • 授予单位 University of California, San Diego.;
  • 学科 Psychology Behavioral.;Legal Studies.;Economics Theory.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 89 p.
  • 总页数 89
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号