首页> 外文学位 >The influence of variability of the mobility and persistence parameters of the PRZM 3.22A model for evaluation and leaching assessment of pesticides.
【24h】

The influence of variability of the mobility and persistence parameters of the PRZM 3.22A model for evaluation and leaching assessment of pesticides.

机译:PRZM 3.22A模型的迁移率和持久性参数的变化对农药评估和浸出评估的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Leaching models are considered the best means for evaluating relative groundwater contamination potential in the absence of monitoring data. One important approach for minimizing disagreement between model predictions and observed field data is a model calibration (selected model inputs are modified to improve the model's predictability). The most commonly used model (particularly in the U.S.) has been the Pesticide Root Zone Model (PRZM). The objectives of this study were: first, to evaluate the performance of PRZM 3.22A in predicting the fate and transport of a range of mobile pesticides by refining the values of the following input parameters (dispersion coefficient, pesticide degradation rate with depth, temperature and moisture corrected degradation, and Freundlich Coefficient) second, to recommend the refinement of modeling procedures and subsequently improve the model's prediction capabilities, and third, to provide the U.S. EPA with a validated-Tier II leaching scenario for regulatory decision-making. The results are mixed in terms of the ability of PRZM to simulate tracer. Overall the timing of bromide movement at the four study sites was predicted well except for the Group B lysimeters (those with fine-textured soil layer) at the California site. With regard to pesticide leaching, in general peak and overall mass flux were about right or somewhat under predicted at CA Group A locations, under predicted at GA2L (except when the Freundlich coefficient was applied), over predicted at CA Group B locations, NC4L, and hugely over predicted at GA1L. Overall, our results show that there are too many unknowns to use PRZM to accurately predict the extent of pesticide leaching. However, while some specific model errors appear to have been identified (particularly with model's use of the DISP input parameter), it appears that most of the deviations of the predictions from the observed are due to lack of understanding of the behavior of solutes and of how specific site characteristics influence solute transport.
机译:在没有监测数据的情况下,浸出模型被认为是评估相对地下水污染潜力的最佳手段。最小化模型预测与观察到的现场数据之间的分歧的一种重要方法是模型校准(修改选定的模型输入以提高模型的可预测性)。最常用的模型(尤其是在美国)是农药根系区域模型(PRZM)。这项研究的目的是:首先,通过完善以下输入参数(分散系数,农药降解率随深度,温度和湿度)的值,评估PRZM 3.22A在​​预测一系列移动农药的命运和运输中的性能。水分校正后的降解,以及Freundlich系数),第二,建议完善建模程序,随后提高模型的预测能力,第三,为美国EPA提供经过验证的Tier II淋洗方案,用于监管决策。就PRZM模拟示踪剂的能力而言,结果是混杂的。总体上,对四个研究地点溴化物移动的时间进行了很好的预测,除了加利福尼亚地点的B组溶氧计(那些具有细纹理的土壤层)。就农药浸出而言,一般而言,CA组A处的峰值和总质量通量大约是正确的或略有低于GA2L组的预测(应用Freundlich系数时除外),高于CA B组的NC4L,并且大大超出了GA1L的预期。总体而言,我们的结果表明,使用PRZM准确预测农药浸出程度的未知数太多。但是,虽然似乎已经识别出某些特定的模型错误(尤其是模型使用DISP输入参数),但看来与预测值的大部分偏差是由于对溶质和杂质行为的了解不足所致。具体位点特征如何影响溶质运输。

著录项

  • 作者

    Abdel-Saheb, Ibrahim.;

  • 作者单位

    Union Institute and University.;

  • 授予单位 Union Institute and University.;
  • 学科 Environmental Sciences.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2003
  • 页码 452 p.
  • 总页数 452
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号