首页> 外文学位 >Re-defining pro-life: Why a consistent ethics of life should not oppose abortion.
【24h】

Re-defining pro-life: Why a consistent ethics of life should not oppose abortion.

机译:重新定义生命:为什么一贯的生命伦理不应反对堕胎。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This thesis seeks to establish a philosophical foundation on which to argue that actually, pro-choice and pro-life should be understood as complementary terms, rather than as opposing terms. It discusses different ways of situating the term life as ethically-significant, and develops a definition of an ethics of life that is independent of a pro-choice or anti-choice stance on abortion. Drawing upon the notion of a consistent ethics of life as a fruitful place to seek out a broader meaning of the term pro-life, it first considers two anti-choice attempts at constructing such an ethics. The first is a conservative Catholic ethics of life, as presented in John Paul II's Evangelium Vitae and in Joseph Cardinal Bernardin's seamless garment conception of ethics. The second is based in pro-life feminism, which argues that through abortion, women capitulate to a patriarchal logic that violates the biological orientation of women toward nurturing and relationality.;Both of these ethical programmes, this thesis argues, fulfill the minimum criteria necessary to be recognizable as an ethics of life. But despite their aspirations toward consistency, both nonetheless fail to offer an adequate ethics of life. First, they engage in feminine stereotyping, defining women as morally incompetent and limiting their self-determination by continually identifying women with motherhood. Second, they provide a distorted characterization of human life, in which the temporal context of that life, and its relationship to the lives of non-human species, are both occluded. Third, they engage in irresponsible optimism by assuming that it is always good to bring more life into the world. This consequences of this assumption include an unrealistic romanticization of motherhood and of childrearing, and an inability to honestly face up to such issues as overpopulation and environmental degradation.;Finally, this thesis offers an alternative to anti-choice attempts at constructing a consistent ethics of life. Drawing upon the work of Grace Jantzen and Hannah Arendt, it proposes an "ethics of flourishing" in which the natality of women, the embodied realities of women's lives, and women's status as a who instead of a what, are all fully acknowledged. Such acknowledgement, the thesis argues, ultimately requires a pro-choice stance if it is to be genuine.
机译:本论文力求建立一个哲学基础,在该哲学基础上,主张选择和支持生活实际上应被理解为补充性术语,而不是相反的术语。它讨论了将生命一词视为具有道德意义的不同方法,并提出了一种关于生命伦理的定义,该定义独立于堕胎的选择或反对选择。它以一贯的生活伦理学概念作为寻求“生命”一词更广泛含义的一个富有成果的地方,首先考虑了两种反选择尝试来构建这样的伦理学。首先是保守的天主教生活伦理,如约翰保罗二世的福音传教士和约瑟夫·红衣主教伯纳丁的无缝服装伦理学所提出的。第二个观点是基于赞成生命的女权主义,该观点认为,通过堕胎,妇女屈从于父权制逻辑,这违背了妇女对抚养和关系的生物学取向。被公认是一种生活伦理。但是,尽管他们渴望实现连贯性,但两者都未能提供足够的生活伦理。首先,他们从事女性陈规定型观念,将妇女定义为道德上无能的人,并通过不断确定具有母性的妇女来限制她们的自决权。其次,它们提供了扭曲的人类生活特征,其中隐瞒了该生命的时间背景及其与非人类物种生命的关系。第三,他们以不负责任的乐观态度为前提,认为将更多的生活带入世界总是好的。这种假设的后果包括对母性和育儿的不切实际的浪漫化,以及无法诚实地面对人口过剩和环境恶化等问题。;最后,本论文为反选择尝试提供了一种替代选择,以建立一致的道德观念。生活。它借鉴了格蕾丝·詹岑(Grace Jantzen)和汉娜·阿伦特(Hannah Arendt)的著作,提出了“繁荣的伦理”,其中充分承认了妇女的天赋,妇女生活的具体现实以及妇女的身份,而不是身份。论文认为,这种承认最终要想成为真诚,就需要选择立场。

著录项

  • 作者

    Derynck, Tracy Laura.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Calgary (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 University of Calgary (Canada).;
  • 学科 Religion Philosophy of.;Ethics.;Womens Studies.;Religion General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 300 p.
  • 总页数 300
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:45:02

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号