首页> 外文学位 >The Poetics of Creative Emptiness: Its development in China from Ancient Times to the Early Qing.
【24h】

The Poetics of Creative Emptiness: Its development in China from Ancient Times to the Early Qing.

机译:创意空虚的诗学:从古代到清初在中国的发展。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The dissertation investigates a poetics of creative kong (emptiness) by studying the philosophical origins of the concept of emptiness in Indian Buddhism as well as its development in China from ancient times through the seventeenth century. I argue for the philosophical and religious significance of kong in the Chinese context as being open-minded, non-obsessive, and creative. The poetics and aesthetics of kong owes a significant debt to Confucianism, Daoism, and Buddhism. The senses of kong helped the writers and artists of the Ming to intuitively feel and observe the immanent vividness of the world, and to stimulate their vitality and creativity when they sought a communion with Nature (rather than interfering with it).;The human experience of nature is expressed in unique ways in late Ming China. Despite striking affinities with other developments in aesthetics around the world, the late Ming sensibility forces us to re-think the larger history of world culture. Long before the Western Romantics or Symbolists developed their experimental ideas, late-Ming writers and artists achieved a communion with nature in practicing a poetics of creative kong (emptiness) represented in such aesthetic qualities as qing (limpidity), dan (blandness), xingling (individual inspiration), kongling (inspiration ex nihilo), and shenyun (spiritual resonance). Their vision and artistic works remind us of those of the Romantic era in the West but reveal, by contrast, an important aspect in Western Romanticism. As many scholars have observed, the Romantics imposed anthropomorphic assumptions, making anthropomorphism part of their accounts of the external environment; in that process the internal and the external were often confused. Late-Ming figures, for a variety of reasons that I explore, do not display this tendency.;I also argue that the new ideas in the poetics of creative kong were the main reasons for creativity and originality that prevailed in different artistic endeavors of sixteenth- and seventeenth-century China. Western critical concepts such as Kant's idea of aesthetic "disinterestedness" in the Age of Enlightenment, Keats's negative capability in the Romantic era, Mallarme's white space in the Symbolist movement, and Alberti's white wall during the Renaissance are studied in their affinities with, and differences from, the Ming concept of creative emptiness.;By contextualizing representations of these concepts in literary and artistic works within both their cultural background and analytical interpretations and in extensive analyses of significant texts, I attempt to describe a picture of the Chinese poetics of creative kong from its early stage to its later innovations. At the same time, by showing previously neglected similarities between the Chinese writers and artists of "creative emptiness" and Western figures in philosophy, literature, and art, I want to suggest that a comparison of these two traditions would substantially contribute to world aesthetics.
机译:本文通过研究印度佛教中的空虚概念的哲学渊源以及从古到十七世纪在中国的发展,研究了创造性的空虚(空虚)的诗学。我主张在中国语境下,香港的思想和宗教意义是开放的,不执着的和富有创造力的。孔子的诗学和美学归功于儒学,道教和佛教。孔子的感觉帮助明代的作家和艺术家直观地感受和观察世界的内在生动性,并在他们寻求与自然的相通(而不是干扰自然)时激发了他们的活力和创造力。在明末中国,自然界以独特的方式表达出来。尽管与世界各地美学的其他发展有着密切的联系,但明代晚期的情感迫使我们重新思考世界文化的悠久历史。在西方浪漫主义者或象征主义者发展他们的实验思想之前,晚明的作家和艺术家通过实践以清(轻薄),丹(淡淡),杏玲等美学品质表现的创造性的空虚(空虚)诗学,与大自然相通。 (个人灵感),kongling(灵感来自nihilo)和shenyun(精神共鸣)。他们的视野和艺术作品使我们想起了西方的浪漫主义时代,但相比之下,它们揭示了西方浪漫主义的一个重要方面。正如许多学者所观察到的,浪漫主义者强加了拟人化的假设,使拟人化成为他们对外部环境的描述的一部分。在此过程中,内部和外部经常被混淆。出于各种原因,我发现晚明人物没有表现出这种趋势。我还认为,创意孔子诗学中的新观念是导致创意和独创性在16世纪不同艺术作品中盛行的主要原因。 -和17世纪的中国。西方的批判概念,如康德在启蒙时代的审美“无私”观念,济慈在浪漫主义时代的消极能力,马拉美在象征主义运动中的空白以及文艺复兴时期的阿尔贝蒂的白墙,都在它们之间的亲缘关系和差异上进行了研究。通过在文化背景和分析解释以及对重要文本的广泛分析中对这些概念在文学和艺术作品中的表现进行语境化,我试图描述一幅中国创意孔子诗意画。从早期到后来的创新。同时,通过展示中国作家和艺术家之间“创造性的空虚”与西方人物在哲学,文学和艺术领域之间先前被忽略的相似之处,我想提出,将这两种传统进行比较将大大有助于世界美学。

著录项

  • 作者

    Shen, Liyan.;

  • 作者单位

    Indiana University.;

  • 授予单位 Indiana University.;
  • 学科 Literature Comparative.;Literature Asian.;Philosophy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 319 p.
  • 总页数 319
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号