首页> 外文学位 >The history of philosophy through a feminist magnifying glass: Distortion or clarification?
【24h】

The history of philosophy through a feminist magnifying glass: Distortion or clarification?

机译:通过女权主义放大镜的哲学史:扭曲还是澄清?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The aim of this dissertation is to contribute to the evaluation of the feminist approach to the history of philosophy. Feminist philosophers have attempted to reread and reinterpret texts of the philosophical canon in order to uncover the gender biases they believe are inherent in these philosophical works. They have introduced a new critical reading strategy that utilizes the concepts of “gender” and “situatedness” as analytical tools. The feminist interpretive strategy focuses mainly on examining ways in which philosophers' gender-based assumptions about women affect their theories.; I assess the effectiveness of the feminist interpretive strategy through a case study approach. I present a selective survey of feminist critiques of four central philosophical figures, namely, Plato, Descartes, Mill, and de Beauvoir. My method of analyzing the feminist critique of the philosophical canon is based on a close reading of the canonical texts themselves. Although I value the importance of studying the history of philosophy in terms of its relevance to contemporary issues, I believe it is necessary that a philosopher's argument be captured as accurately as possible before its connection to issues of contemporary interests can be successfully examined. In each chapter, I identify the philosophical issues that feminists consider problematic, I offer my interpretation through a close reading of the philosophical texts, and conclude each case with an evaluation of the feminist interpretation of the history of philosophy.; I have found substantive errors of textual interpretation in all four cases I examined. I attribute these errors to misuses of the feminist interpretive strategy that centers on the concepts of “gender” and “situatedness”. I argue that the feminist analytical tools are misused when they serve to manipulate isolated philosophical arguments to strengthen claims of the feminist interpreters. Such errors undermine the interpretive values of the feminist history of philosophy. Also, they overshadow the contribution of the feminist approach in helping us understand the connection between past philosophical ideas and issues that are important to contemporary feminist thoughts.
机译:本文的目的是为评价哲学史上的女权主义方法做出贡献。女权主义哲学家试图重新阅读和重新诠释哲学经典,以揭示他们认为这些哲学作品固有的性别偏见。他们引入了一种新的批判性阅读策略,该策略利用“性别”和“处境”的概念作为分析工具。女权主义的解释策略主要侧重于研究哲学家对妇女的基于性别的假设如何影响其理论。我通过个案研究方法评估了女权主义解释策略的有效性。我将对柏拉图,笛卡尔,米尔和波伏娃这四个核心哲学人物的女权主义批评进行一次有选择的调查。我分析哲学经典的女性主义批评的方法是基于对经典文本本身的仔细阅读。尽管我看重研究哲学史与当代问题的相关性的重要性,但我认为在成功地检验哲学家与当代利益问题的联系之前,必须尽可能准确地把握哲学家的论点。在每一章中,我都会指出女权主义者认为有问题的哲学问题,我会通过仔细阅读哲学著作来提供我的解释,并通过对女权主义对哲学史的解释的评估来总结每个案例。在我检查的所有四个案例中,我都发现文本解释存在实质性错误。我将这些错误归因于对以“性别”和“处境”概念为中心的女权主义解释策略的误用。我认为,女权主义分析工具在操纵孤立的哲学论点以加强女权主义解释者的主张时被滥用。这种错误破坏了女权主义哲学史的解释价值。而且,它们使女权主义方法在帮助我们理解过去的哲学思想与对当代女权主义思想至关重要的问题之间的联系上的贡献黯然失色。

著录项

  • 作者

    Amatayakul, Supakwadee.;

  • 作者单位

    The Claremont Graduate University.;

  • 授予单位 The Claremont Graduate University.;
  • 学科 Philosophy.; Womens Studies.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2003
  • 页码 118 p.
  • 总页数 118
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 哲学理论 ; 社会学 ;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号