首页> 外文学位 >Watchmen in the Night: The House Judiciary Committee's Impeachment Inquiry of Richard Nixon.
【24h】

Watchmen in the Night: The House Judiciary Committee's Impeachment Inquiry of Richard Nixon.

机译:守夜人:众议院司法委员会对理查德·尼克松的弹each调查。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

When the Judiciary Committee initiated its impeachment inquiry of Richard Nixon for his complicity in Watergate, it was the first time that the House of Representatives had commenced such a proceeding against a president since Andrew Johnson in 1868. Johnson's impeachment and subsequent Senate acquittal was widely regarded as an example of Congress run amok, its partisanship so blatant and its failure so grand that many Americans assumed that presidential impeachment had become obsolete. But impeachment, by its nature, is political, and each Congress defines the bounds of high crimes and misdemeanors in light of the current political climate. For the House in October 1973, Nixon's Watergate scandal threatened to breach those limits.;From the outset, Judiciary Chairman Peter Rodino recognized that if his Committee were to recommend impeaching President Nixon without bipartisan support, the American public would interpret it as another Johnson-like fiasco, and a threat to the constitutional system of government. To thwart suspicion that the Democratic majority would impeach Nixon exclusively for its own political gain, Rodino preached fairness to the President, even as Nixon refused to comply with the Committee's investigation. Despite Rodino's assurances, however, his procedural proposals---designed in consultation with the Committee's Special Counsel, John Doar---did not always seem fair enough to many Republicans. At the same time, many Democrats believed that Rodino and Doar had already accorded Nixon too many rights, which encroached upon the House's constitutionally guaranteed "sole power of impeachment.";Ultimately, Rodino conceded that he could not marshal a bipartisan majority without making compromises with members who expected more fairness than he and Doar had initially offered. Despite pressure from their congressional leadership, constituents, and the White House, seven southern Democrats and moderate Republicans formed a "Fragile Coalition" to vote their conscience in favor of three articles of impeachment. In doing so, they convinced a fearful and cynical American public that impeachment could be just, and in the case of Richard Nixon, necessary.
机译:当司法委员会针对理查德·尼克松(Richard Nixon)在水门事件中的同谋发起弹each调查时,这是众议院自1868年安德鲁·约翰逊(Andrew Johnson)以来首次对总统提出这样的程序。作为国会奔波的例子,它的党派立场如此公然,其失败如此盛大,以至于许多美国人认为总统的弹had已经过时了。但是弹imp的性质是政治性的,每届国会都根据当前的政治气候来界定高犯罪率和轻罪的界限。对于1973年10月的众议院来说,尼克松的水门丑闻威胁要违反这些限制。就像惨败一样,并且威胁到政府的宪政体制。为了制止人们怀疑民主党多数会弹Ni尼克松仅仅是为了自己的政治利益,罗迪诺向总统宣讲公平,即使尼克松拒绝遵守委员会的调查。尽管罗迪诺保证了,但是他的程序建议-与委员会特别顾问约翰·杜尔协商而设计的-对许多共和党人来说并不总是那么公平。同时,许多民主党人认为罗迪诺和多尔已经赋予尼克松太多的权利,这侵犯了众议院宪法保障的“弹sole唯一权力”;最终,罗迪诺承认,他不能在不做出任何妥协的情况下封存两党多数。与期望比他和Doar最初提供的公平性更高的成员。尽管有国会领导层,选民和白宫的压力,南部的七个民主党人和温和的共和党人还是组成了一个“脆弱的联盟”,投票赞成其良心支持三项弹each条款。通过这样做,他们说服了一个充满恐惧和愤世嫉俗的美国公众,弹imp可能是公正的,就理查德·尼克松而言,是必要的。

著录项

  • 作者

    Koch, Benjamin Jonah.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Texas at Austin.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Texas at Austin.;
  • 学科 History United States.;History Modern.;Political Science General.;Law.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 472 p.
  • 总页数 472
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号