首页> 外文学位 >How high the 'wall'? A comparison of the church-state separation positions of Thomas Jefferson and John Leland.
【24h】

How high the 'wall'? A comparison of the church-state separation positions of Thomas Jefferson and John Leland.

机译:“墙”有多高?托马斯·杰斐逊(Thomas Jefferson)和约翰·利兰德(John Leland)的教会国家分离立场的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

None did more than Thomas Jefferson during the Founding era of the United States of America to establish religious liberty upon the broadest basis that is consistent with republican government. His letter to Connecticut's Danbury Baptist Association injected language into judicial parlance that is often said to define Church-State relations under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution: “a wall of separation between church and State.”; Baptists were Jefferson's most ardent supporters and John Leland the most influential Baptist in the struggle for religious liberty in Virginia. Since he claimed to stand for Jefferson's principles of religious liberty from the side of the Church, Leland provides a fitting means of comparison to Jefferson's stance from the side of the State. Attention to Jefferson's actions as legislator, Governor, and educator in Virginia revealed he carefully prescribed balancing liberty with virtue to preserve republican liberties by protecting their quality. He promoted a public religion of moral precepts drawn from natural law that were consistent with Christianity without being exclusive to it. Natural law prescribed duties toward God and man that were of axiomatic force as a civil principle in the nation's Founding Era. Its precepts guided the responsible moral development of citizens and political culture of the United States. In this action, which included mandatory ethical lectures grounded upon theistic presuppositions in public education, Jefferson distinguished between an impelled conscience and an informed conscience.; Leland, however, consumed with the prospect of religious oppression, could not dissociate theistic moral training from religious coercion and sought to banish religion's influence from public life.; Baptist leader Isaac Backus stood closer to Jefferson, adhering to John Calvin's distinction between civil and ecclesiastical spheres: teachings of special revelation govern Christians; natural revelation's principles of universal application prescribe standards of civil rule.
机译:在美国建国时期,没有任何人比托马斯·杰斐逊(Thomas Jefferson)在与共和党政府一致的最广泛的基础上建立宗教自由。他在致康涅狄格州丹伯里浸信会的信中将语言注入了司法用语,通常被认为是根据《美国宪法第一修正案》界定了教会与国家之间的关系:“教会与国家之间的隔离墙”;在弗吉尼亚州争取宗教自由的斗争中,施洗者是杰斐逊最热心的支持者,约翰·利兰德是最有影响力的施洗者。由于他声称从教会方面代表杰斐逊的宗教自由原则,因此利兰德提供了一种与国家方面与杰斐逊的立场进行比较的合适方法。杰斐逊在弗吉尼亚州担任立法者,州长和教育家的举动引起人们注意,他谨慎地规定了平衡自由与美德之间的平衡,以通过保护共和自由来保护共和自由。他提倡从自然法中汲取道德戒律的公共宗教,这种宗教戒律与基督教一致,但并不排他。自然法规定对上帝和人的义务是公理,是国家建国时期的公理。它的戒律指导了公民的负责任道德发展和美国的政治文化。在这一行动中,包括基于公共教育中有神论前提的强制性道德讲座,杰斐逊区分了良心驱使和知情良策。然而,利兰德充满了宗教压迫的前景,无法将有神论的道德训练与宗教胁迫相分离,并试图从公共生活中消除宗教的影响。浸信会领袖艾萨克·巴库斯(Isaac Backus)站在杰斐逊(Jefferson)的旁边,坚持约翰·加尔文(John Calvin)在民间和教会领域之间的区别:特殊启示的教导统治着基督徒;自然启示的普遍适用原则规定了民事统治的标准。

著录项

  • 作者

    Huff, Richard Curry.;

  • 作者单位

    Westminster Theological Seminary.;

  • 授予单位 Westminster Theological Seminary.;
  • 学科 Theology.; History United States.; Law.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2003
  • 页码 453 p.
  • 总页数 453
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 宗教;美洲史;法律;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号