首页> 外文学位 >Culture, power and representation: Construction of 'national' culture on state-run television in India, 1982--1998.
【24h】

Culture, power and representation: Construction of 'national' culture on state-run television in India, 1982--1998.

机译:文化,权力和代表制:1982--1998年在印度国营电视台上构建的``民族''文化。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The domain of broadcast policies and television programs provide a useful point of entry for exploring the epistemological underpinnings of national culture in postcolonial India. The construction of national culture during 1982–98, revealed a series of contradictory articulations of power and representation through state ideologies of territoriality, sovereignty and citizenship. As an index of the hegemonic movement of the postcolonial Indian state, these ideologies constitute part of a larger problematic: the crisis of the nation-state.; The dissertation explores representations of nation in television documentary and entertainment programming on Kashmir and Punjab and in state policies regarding television. Discourse and narrative analysis was used to explore the relationships among textual, policy and larger sociopolitical contexts. One of the tasks of the discourse and narrative analysis was to identify main themes and patterns that shaped representations of nation. Five main themes— myth of origins, geography & region, us & them, remaking postcolonial citizen-subjects, and secularism—were identified in the policies and programs that convey attempts to articulate the discourse of national culture.; The analysis revealed particular ideological elaborations of the themes in the social construction of national culture. Though the policies and programs worked within the dominant field of representations, they exhibited marked internal contradictions. For instance, both policies and programs brought the inherent shortcomings of secularism to the surface. The broadcast policies promoted the state-based account of secularism by interpreting religion in rational terms. In arguing for the primacy of the universal (secularism) over the particular (religion), it effectively glossed over the specificities of religious identities.; Theoretically, the dissertation outlined several arguments. First, it situated the particularities and shifts in the discourse of national culture on state-run television vis-à-vis state and politics. Second, it offered a critique of the existing theories of nation in cultural and literary studies that take as their point of departure novels and literature without paying attention either to the specificities of audio-visual forms of communication or the communicative dimensions of nation and national culture. Third, it presented a theoretical perspective sensitive to the postcolonial contexts, particularly a multi-religious and multi-ethnic society like India.
机译:广播政策和电视节目领域为探索后殖民时期印度民族文化的认识论基础提供了有用的切入点。 1982-98年间的民族文化建设,通过国家的领土,主权和公民意识形态,揭示了一系列相互矛盾的权力和代表权表达方式。作为后殖民印度国家霸权运动的一个指标,这些意识形态构成了一个更大问题的一部分:民族国家危机。论文探讨了国家在克什米尔和旁遮普邦的电视纪录片和娱乐节目以及国家电视政策中的代表性。话语和叙事分析被用来探索文本,政策和更大的社会政治背景之间的关系。话语和叙事分析的任务之一是确定塑造民族表征的主要主题和模式。在政策和计划中确定了五个主要主题-起源,地理和地区,我们与他们的神话,重塑后殖民公民主体世俗主义-这些主题传达了试图阐明民族文化的话语。分析揭示了民族文化社会建设中主题的意识形态方面的特殊阐述。尽管这些政策和计划在代表制的主导领域内运作,但它们表现出明显的内部矛盾。例如,政策和方案都暴露了世俗主义的内在缺陷。广播政策通过理性地解释宗教,促进了国家对世俗主义的解释。在主张普遍性(世俗主义)凌驾于特定的(宗教)之上时,它有效地掩盖了宗教身份的特殊性。从理论上讲,论文概述了几个论点。首先,它定位于国营电视相对于国家和政治的民族文化话语的特殊性和转变。其次,它对文化和文学研究中的现有民族理论提出了批评,这些理论以小说和文学为出发点,而不关注视听传播形式的特殊性或民族和民族文化的传播维度。 。第三,它提出了一种对后殖民背景敏感的理论观点,特别是像印度这样的多宗教和多种族的社会。

著录项

  • 作者

    Asthana, Sanjay.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Minnesota.;

  • 授予单位 University of Minnesota.;
  • 学科 Mass Communications.; Education Social Sciences.; Philosophy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2003
  • 页码 188 p.
  • 总页数 188
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 传播理论;社会科学教育与普及;哲学理论;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:44:38

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号