首页> 外文学位 >Political justice in Aristotle's 'Nicomachean Ethics' and 'Politics'.
【24h】

Political justice in Aristotle's 'Nicomachean Ethics' and 'Politics'.

机译:亚里士多德的《尼科马奇伦理学》和《政治学》中的政治正义。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In the center of the fifth book of the Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle elliptically characterizes political justice as a form of reciprocal rule that exists between free and equal persons pursuing a common life directed toward self-sufficiency under the rule of law. My dissertation analyzes Aristotle's thematic treatments of political justice in the Nicomachean Ethics and Politics in order to elucidate its meaning, clarify its relationship to the other forms of justice that he also discusses, and compare it to contemporary neo-Aristotelian accounts of justice.; The first chapter examines the unclear and disputed passages of Ethics V.6--7 and explains why Aristotle discusses political justice in his ethical treatise. The second chapter makes use of Aristotle's juxtaposition of political justice to household justice (the relationship between husband and wife) on the one hand and despotic justice (the relationship between master and slave) on the other hand in order to explicate the necessary conditions of political justice, namely, freedom, equality, commonality, self-sufficiency, and the rule of law. To make sense of these concepts, the chapter explores such topics as Aristotle's understanding of the household, his notion of the self and his political criticisms of Socrates. The third chapter examines political justice or reciprocal rule in the Politics in order to understand how political justice can be both a human virtue and an institutional arrangement of offices. The fourth chapter offers a critique of Fred Miller's reconstruction of Aristotelian natural rights. Although Miller is correct to say that Aristotle recognized and understood "rights claims," he is mistaken in claiming that they are an integral part of Aristotle's practical philosophy. Aristotle understood the problems for political compromise posed by rights conceived as "trumps," and he rejects rights as philosophically fundamental on the grounds that they are an inadequate solution to both the political problem of justice and the stability of flourishing political institutions.
机译:在《尼科马奇伦理》第五本书的中心,亚里斯多德将政治正义刻画为一种互惠统治形式,它存在于自由和平等的人之间,他们追求在法治下实现自给自足的共同生活。我的论文分析了亚里士多德在《尼科马奇伦理学和政治学》中对政治正义的主题处理,以阐明其含义,阐明其与他也讨论过的其他正义形式的关系,并将其与当代新亚里士多德的正义论证进行比较。第一章研究了伦理学V.6--7的不明确和有争议的段落,并解释了亚里士多德为何在其伦理论文中讨论政治正义。第二章利用亚里士多德的政治正义与家庭正义(夫妻之间的关系)和专政正义(主人与奴隶的关系)的并置,以阐明政治的必要条件。正义,即自由,平等,共同性,自给自足和法治。为了理解这些概念,本章探讨了诸如亚里士多德对家庭的理解,他对自我的观念以及对苏格拉底的政治批评等主题。第三章考察了政治中的政治正义或对等统治,以了解政治正义如何既可以作为人类的美德又可以作为职务的机构安排。第四章对弗雷德·米勒对亚里士多德自然权利的重建提出了批评。尽管米勒说亚里士多德承认并理解“权利要求”是正确的,但他在主张权利是亚里士多德的实践哲学不可分割的一部分时错了。亚里斯多德理解权利被认为是“王牌”所造成的政治妥协问题,并且他拒绝将权利视为哲学上的根本,理由是权利既不能解决正义的政治问题,也无法解决蓬勃发展的政治体制的问题。

著录项

  • 作者

    Lockwood, Thornton C., Jr.;

  • 作者单位

    Boston University.;

  • 授予单位 Boston University.;
  • 学科 Philosophy.; Literature Classical.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2004
  • 页码 241 p.
  • 总页数 241
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 哲学理论;世界文学;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:44:28

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号