首页> 外文学位 >Evidence, explanations, and recommendations for teachers' field trip strategies.
【24h】

Evidence, explanations, and recommendations for teachers' field trip strategies.

机译:有关教师实地考察策略的证据,解释和建议。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Field trips are well recognized by researchers as an educational approach with the potential to complement and enhance classroom science teaching by exposing students to unique activities, resources, and content in informal settings. The following investigation addresses teachers' field trip practices in three related manuscripts: (1) A study examining the details of teachers' pedagogical strategies intended to facilitate connections between students' experiences and the school curricula while visiting an aquarium; (2) A study documenting and describing sources of knowledge that teachers draw from when leading field trips to an aquarium; (3) A position paper that reviews and summarizes research on effective pedagogical strategies for field trips. Together these three pieces address key questions regarding teachers' practices on field trips: (1) What strategies are teachers employing (and not employing) during self-guided field trips to facilitate learning tied to the class curriculum? (2) What sources of knowledge do teachers utilize when leading field trips? (3) How can teachers be better prepared to lead trips that promote learning? The Oregon Coast Aquarium served as the field trip site for teachers included in this study. The setting suited these questions because the aquarium serves tens of thousands of students on field trips each year but provides no targeted programming for these students as they explore the exhibits. In other words, the teachers who lead field trips assume much of the responsibility for facilitating students' experience. In order to describe and characterize teachers' strategies to link students' experiences to the curriculum, a number of teachers (26) were observed as they led their students' visit to the public spaces of the aquarium. Artifacts, such as worksheets, used during the visit were collected for analysis as well. Subsequently, all teachers were surveyed regarding their use of the field trip and their sources of knowledge for their practices. A subset of eight teachers were interviewed using guided conversations in order to shed further light on their use of the aquarium field trip and their pedagogical preparation. Data from all sources were organized by repeating ideas relevant to the questions of interest. The resulting evidence was interpreted to support distinct categories of teacher strategies and experience and related claims about these strategies and experiences. Thus, findings reveal that teachers attempt to link the curriculum to the activities, resources, and content encountered on the trip using a variety of connections. However, these curriculum connections are characterized as products of opportunistic situations and reveal limited depth. Evidence further indicates that teachers treat the aquarium visit as a background experience for their students rather than as an opportunity to introduce new concepts or do an activity that is integrated into the curriculum. Nevertheless, teachers included in this study were leading field trips that created countless learning opportunities for their students. Because training specific to field trips is rarely included in preservice programs, teachers were asked about influences on their field trip practice with specific focus on observed strategies. Findings suggest four categories of training experiences that teachers apply to their practice: (1) informal mentoring; (2) past experience trip leading; (3) outdoor education training; (4) traditional education training. Overall findings along with a review of previous research are suggestive of many ways in which efforts to enhance students' learning opportunities may be developed by means of support for teachers. Foremost among recommendations is the idea that field trip pedagogy be integrated into science methods courses required for preservice teachers (the premise for the final manuscript). Furthermore, the findings of this study may serve as a starting point for museums interested in the development of specific support and teacher professional development activities intended to enhance teachers' use of their resources as learning opportunities for their students. Among the implications is the idea that museums and other institutions developing teacher professional development activities might capitalize on teachers' existing sources of knowledge, for example by providing structured support for peer-mentoring and guided reflections related to field trip preparations and skills.
机译:实地考察是研究人员公认的一种教育方法,它有可能通过使学生在非正式环境中接触独特的活动,资源和内容来补充和增强课堂科学教学。以下调查以三篇相关的手稿探讨了教师的实地考察实践:(1)一项研究,旨在详细探讨教师教学策略的细节,以促进学生在访问水族馆时的体验与学校课程之间的联系; (2)记录和描述教师带领实地考察水族馆的知识来源的研究; (3)一份立场文件,回顾并总结了有关实地考察的有效教学策略的研究。这三个部分共同解决了有关教师实地考察实践的关键问题:(1)在自我指导的实地考察中,教师采用(或不采用)什么策略来促进与课堂课程相关的学习? (2)领导实地考察时,教师利用什么知识来源? (3)教师如何更好地准备带领旅行以促进学习?俄勒冈海岸水族馆是本研究中教师的实地考察地点。该设置适合这些问题,因为水族馆每年为成千上万的学生提供实地考察服务,但在这些学生探索展品时不提供针对性的编程。换句话说,带领实地考察的老师承担了促进学生体验的大部分责任。为了描述和表征教师将学生的经历与课程联系起来的策略,当他们带领学生参观水族馆的公共场所时,观察到了许多教师(26)。访问期间还使用了工件(例如工作表)进行分析。随后,对所有教师进行了实地考察,并对他们的实践知识来源进行了调查。为了对他们使用水族馆的实地考察和教学准备做进一步的了解,对八名教师的一部分进行了有指导的对话。通过重复与感兴趣的问题相关的想法来组织来自所有来源的数据。由此产生的证据被解释为支持不同类别的教师策略和经验以及有关这些策略和经验的相关主张。因此,调查结果表明,教师试图通过各种联系将课程与旅途中遇到的活动,资源和内容联系起来。但是,这些课程联系被描述为机会主义情况的产物,并且显示的深度有限。证据还表明,教师将参观水族馆作为他们学生的背景体验,而不是作为机会介绍新概念或进行融入课程的活动。尽管如此,本研究中的教师还是带领实地考察,为学生创造了无数的学习机会。由于在职前培训中很少包括针对实地考察的培训,因此向教师询问了对实地考察实践的影响,特别侧重于观察到的策略。调查结果建议教师将四类培训经验应用于他们的实践:(1)非正式指导; (2)以往的经验旅行领导; (3)户外教育培训; (4)传统教育培训。总体研究结果以及对以前研究的回顾表明,可以通过支持老师的方式来努力提高学生的学习机会。在建议中,最重要的建议是将实地考察教学法纳入职前教师所需的科学方法课程中(最终手稿的前提)。此外,这项研究的结果可以作为博物馆感兴趣的博物馆的起点,这些博物馆对发展特定的支持和教师专业发展活动感兴趣,这些活动旨在增强教师对他们的资源的利用,为学生提供学习机会。其中的含义是,博物馆和其他开展教师专业发展活动的机构可能会利用教师的现有知识资源,例如通过为同伴指导和与实地考察准备和技能相关的指导性思考提供结构化支持。

著录项

  • 作者

    Rebar, Bryan.;

  • 作者单位

    Oregon State University.;

  • 授予单位 Oregon State University.;
  • 学科 Education Environmental.;Museology.;Education Sciences.;Education Teacher Training.;Education Pedagogy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 149 p.
  • 总页数 149
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号