首页> 外文学位 >Disciplines of the secret: Concealing and revealing religious knowledge in Kierkegaardian ethics and fourth-century Christian initiation rites.
【24h】

Disciplines of the secret: Concealing and revealing religious knowledge in Kierkegaardian ethics and fourth-century Christian initiation rites.

机译:秘密的纪律:隐藏和揭示基尔凯郭尔伦理学和四世纪基督教起义仪式中的宗教知识。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Secrecy, the intentional concealment of knowledge from another, is generally condemned on philosophical grounds, as secrecy interrupts the philosophical drive toward universal knowledge and can be used to limit the free will of another. Secrecy is frequently approved on religious grounds, however, because in religions, the individual's personal experience and relation to the divine is decisive, and because religious groups in their cultic lives place strong emphasis on the distinctive identity of the individual and the group. This dissertation demonstrates how secrecy is essential to the Christian ethics of Soren Kierkegaard and the rites of Christian initiation practiced by three major fourth-century bishops: Cyril of Jerusalem, Ambrose of Milan, and Augustine of Hippo. Specifically, while secrecy's negative impact in Christian ethics and initiation must be mitigated as much as possible, the role secrecy plays is essentially a positive one, and indeed, is often essential to fulfilling ethical and liturgical aims. Despite the many obvious differences between Kierkegaard and the fourth-century bishops, these sources put secrecy to strikingly similar use in their ethics and liturgy, respectively. Kierkegaard describes the God-relationship as a secret because it is incommunicable, and this secret eventuates in the need to conceal one's agency when enacting works of love, the "greatest" of which is to initiate another into the God-relationship that enables one to love. The fourth-century bishops see the sacramental experience as an incommunicable secret that requires bishops to prevent the unbaptized from being exposed to this experience. In both cases, the authors advocate secrecy in order to ensure the authenticity of something distinctively Christian. For Kierkegaard, keeping "the secret of faith" protects the faith from being distorted by worldly philosophy, and concealing one's agency protects both the agent and the beneficiary from slipping into an economy of exchange. For the fourth-century bishops, secrecy in initiation serves to impart and preserve a distinctive Christian identity among those seeking initiation. The dissertation concludes by contrasting the twentieth-century Catholic Church's ineffective reintroduction of secrecy into its rite of initiation with a potentially important proposal from Dietrich Bonhoeffer regarding the positive role secrecy can play in Christian ethical life.
机译:保密是对知识的有意隐瞒,通常以哲学为由予以谴责,因为保密会中断哲学对普遍知识的追求,并可用来限制他人的自由意志。保密性通常是出于宗教原因而被批准的,但是,因为在宗教中,个人的个人经历和与神的关系是决定性的,并且由于宗教团体在其宗教生活中非常重视个人和团体的独特身份。本文证明了秘密对索伦·基尔凯郭尔(Soren Kierkegaard)的基督教道德至关重要,以及三位主要的四世纪主教(耶路撒冷的西里尔,米兰的安布罗斯和河马的奥古斯丁)实行的基督教启蒙仪式。具体而言,虽然必须尽可能减轻保密对基督教道德和启蒙运动的负面影响,但保密在本质上是积极的,而且对于实现道德和礼仪目标通常是必不可少的。尽管基尔凯郭尔和四世纪的主教之间有许多明显的区别,但这些消息来源分别将保密性显着地用于道德和礼仪上。 Kierkegaard将上帝关系描述为一个秘密,因为它是不可沟通的,并且这种秘密最终导致在制作爱情作品时需要掩盖自己的代理人,而其中“最伟大的”就是将另一个人带入上帝关系中,从而使人能够爱。第四世纪的主教将圣礼的经历视为不可沟通的秘密,要求主教防止未受洗的人暴露于这种经历。在这两种情况下,作者都提倡保密,以确保某些基督教徒的真实性。对于Kierkegaard而言,保留“信仰的秘密”可以保护信仰,使其免受世俗哲学的扭曲,而隐藏代理人可以保护代理人和受益人免受交易经济的影响。对于四世纪的主教来说,起初保密是为了在寻求初学者的人们中传授和保留独特的基督教身份。论文的结尾通过对比二十世纪天主教会在其启动仪式中无效地重新引入秘密与迪特里希·邦霍弗(Dietrich Bonhoeffer)提出的关于秘密在基督教道德生活中可以发挥的积极作用的潜在重要提议的对比。

著录项

  • 作者

    Malesic, Jonathan Jay.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Virginia.;

  • 授予单位 University of Virginia.;
  • 学科 Religion History of.;Theology.;Religion Philosophy of.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2004
  • 页码 293 p.
  • 总页数 293
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:44:17

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号