首页> 外文学位 >Mesolimbic dopamine involvement in Pavlovian and operant approach behaviors.
【24h】

Mesolimbic dopamine involvement in Pavlovian and operant approach behaviors.

机译:中脑边缘多巴胺参与巴甫洛夫和操作性进近行为。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Previous research has yielded conflicting results regarding the involvement of mesolimbic dopamine in Pavlovian and operant tasks. While there is abundant evidence that an operant lever press requires intact dopamine (DA) D1 transmission in the nucleus accumbens (ACB) and in the basolateral amygdala (BLA), there is conflicting evidence regarding the specific brain sites at which DA mediates a Pavlovian approach response. The present study was designed to compare the effects of ACB and BLA D1 receptor-blockade on an operant and Pavlovian task, while minimizing differences in behavioral response topography. Animals were trained on either a Pavlovian cued approach task or an operant cued nosepoke task. In the Pavlovian approach task, a tone signaled a pellet delivery to which animals responded with a head entry into a food compartment. In the operant nosepoke task, animals were trained to emit a nosepoke in response to the same tone, in order to trigger a pellet delivery. Bilateral microinfusions of the D1 antagonist SCH 23390 (0, 1 or 2 mug/side) into either the ACB or the BLA produced a dose-dependent disruption of the operant nosepoke. In contrast, the Pavlovian cued approach response was unaffected by D1 antagonist microinfusions into either the ACB or the BLA. In addition, infusion of SCH 23390 into either site suppressed general locomotion. The results suggest a dissociation of the anatomical substrates mediating an operant nosepoke and a Pavlovian approach, despite similar response topographies. These findings are consistent with the notion that D1 activity at the ACB and BLA plays a role in the expression of operant responses, but not in the expression of Pavlovian approach responses.
机译:关于中脑边缘多巴胺参与巴甫洛夫式和手术性任务的先前研究得出了矛盾的结果。尽管有大量证据表明操作杠杆按压需要伏隔核(ACB)和基底外侧杏仁核(BLA)中完整的多巴胺(DA)D1传递,但有关DA介导巴甫洛夫方法的特定大脑部位的证据却相互矛盾响应。本研究旨在比较ACB和BLA D1受体阻滞对操作性和Pavlovian任务的影响,同时最大程度地减少行为响应拓扑的差异。对动物进行了巴甫洛夫式暗示进场任务或操作者暗示鼻刺任务的培训。在巴甫洛夫式进近任务中,一种语气表示颗粒被传送,动物对此做出了回应,头部进入了食物室。在操作鼻涕任务中,对动物进行了训练以响应相同的音调发出鼻涕,以触发药丸的递送。将D1拮抗剂SCH 23390(0、1或2个杯子/侧面)双边微输注到ACB或BLA中会产生剂量依赖性的鼻塞破裂。相比之下,巴甫洛夫暗示的进场反应不受ACB或BLA中D1拮抗剂微输注的影响。此外,将SCH 23390注入任一部位均抑制了整体运动。结果表明尽管有类似的反应地形,但解剖底物的分离却介导了有效的鼻息和巴甫洛夫方法。这些发现与以下观点一致:ACB和BLA的D1活性在操作应答的表达中起作用,而在巴甫洛夫方法应答的表达中不起作用。

著录项

  • 作者

    Morvan, Cecile I.;

  • 作者单位

    Boston College.;

  • 授予单位 Boston College.;
  • 学科 Biology Neuroscience.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 196 p.
  • 总页数 196
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号