首页> 外文学位 >TransStates: Conceptual Art in Eastern Europe and the Limits of Utopia.
【24h】

TransStates: Conceptual Art in Eastern Europe and the Limits of Utopia.

机译:跨国公司:东欧的概念艺术和乌托邦的局限性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation explores the utopian and metaphysical aspirations found in the pockets of collective creativity that drove Conceptual art in Eastern Europe in the 1960s and 1970s. It does so by focusing on two groups of artists from the places that defined the limits of relative freedom and unfreedom in Cold War Eastern Europe: the former Yugoslavia and the former USSR. Thus, I trace the trajectories of philosophical and stylistic developments in the work of the OHO collective, which worked in Ljubljana (Slovenia) from 1965-1971 and the work of the duo of Vitaly Komar and Alexander Melamid which they did between 1972 and 1980, before and immediately after their emigration from Moscow to the U.S.;In narrating the groups' histories and addressing the existing narratives about them, I pay particular attention to the way the groups' work was tied to both local forms of protest and desire for self-governed spaces of freedom, as well as to a larger global shift in both the production and display of art taking place in the 1960s and 1970s. Moreover, I argue that within the global Conceptual shift of which these collectives were part, their practices were singularly representative of the preoccupations broadly shared by artists in Eastern Europe. In both cases, the oeuvres encompassed diverse media and spoke to multiple audiences, both actual and imagined, often using similar tropes. Even more importantly, in both cases, the groups' projects were driven by a desire to respond to utopian aspirations through artistic practice, self-consciously modeling through art the possibilities of personal politics in one's particular time and place. It is in these responses to the utopian impulse that one also finds the stark contrast between OHO and Komar and Melamid, who define the far opposite ends of the spectrum of good and bad faith in utopia. In doing so, they offer insight both into the wide array of roles that unofficial art sought to play in Cold War Eastern Europe and into the limits to which utopianism could still be reconciled with artistic practice in the wake of the Conceptual shift.
机译:本文探讨了在1960年代和1970年代推动东欧概念艺术的集体创造力口袋中发现的乌托邦和形而上的愿望。这样做的重点是确定冷战东欧地区相对自由和非自由的局限性的两组艺术家:前南斯拉夫和前苏联。因此,我追溯了1965年至1971年在卢布尔雅那(斯洛文尼亚)工作的OHO集体的工作以及1972年至1980年间维塔利·科马尔和亚历山大·梅拉米德二人组的工作在哲学和文体发展方面的轨迹,在他们从莫斯科移民到美国之前和之后;在叙述这些团体的历史并探讨有关它们的现有叙述时,我特别注意这些团体的工作与当地的抗议形式和对自我的渴望联系在一起的方式统治着自由空间,并且在1960年代和1970年代发生了更大的全球生产和展示艺术转移。此外,我认为,在这些集体参与其中的全球观念转变中,他们的行为独特地代表了东欧艺术家广泛分享的关注点。在这两种情况下,作品都囊括了多种媒体,并且经常使用相似的比喻与实际和想象中的多个受众对话。更为重要的是,在这两种情况下,这些团体的项目都是由通过艺术实践来响应乌托邦理想的愿望所驱动,通过艺术自觉地在一个特定的时间和地点进行个人政治的可能性的建模。正是在对乌托邦冲动的这些回应中,人们还发现了OHO与Komar和Melamid之间的鲜明对比,后者界定了乌托邦的善意和恶意信念的截然相反的两端。这样一来,他们不仅可以洞悉非官方艺术在冷战东欧所扮演的广泛角色,还可以洞察概念转变之后,乌托邦主义仍可以与艺术实践相融的极限。

著录项

  • 作者

    Gurshtein, Ksenya A.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Michigan.;

  • 授予单位 University of Michigan.;
  • 学科 Art History.;History Russian and Soviet.;East European Studies.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 323 p.
  • 总页数 323
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号