首页> 外文学位 >Liberalizing telecommunications services in China: The limits of economic reform without political reform.
【24h】

Liberalizing telecommunications services in China: The limits of economic reform without political reform.

机译:中国电信服务的自由化:没有进行政治改革的经济改革的局限性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Can technological change and economic liberalization erode the control of an authoritarian government? Can market reform lead to political reform? This dissertation reaches some conclusions about the telecommunications services market in China that respond to these questions. First, partial liberalization of the telecommunications market in the last fifteen years increased the number of actors in the industry, diluting the state's control. On the other hand, government interests in controlling information that flows over these networks resulted in limited entry into the market, curtailing competition and preserving substantial state control. Second, the growth of technologically new services, despite government prohibitions, demonstrates how tenuous the state's regulatory authority is. Among firms, only the politically-connected benefit. Small firms, even if they are technology pioneers, remain marginal without political backing. Third, the state's authority is weak because its most important decisions are driven by ideology rather than reflecting actual market conditions. Consequently, regulation fails to take into account the enormous incentives for firms and consumers that do not to comply with the rules.; The literature on the impact of economic reform on political reform since China began economic reforms in the 1980's primarily relies on a rising middle class that demands more voice as the key to democratization. Instead, this dissertation suggests that a more fruitful line of inquiry may be to investigate those areas where political reform would enhance the goals of the Chinese state. In telecommunications service policy, economic reform and technological change has created an environment where the lack of consultative, pluralistic policy-making weakens the state's authority. Whether the Chinese state, in these circumstances, will accept political reform remains to be seen. However, developments in other areas, such as rural village elections, suggest that the Chinese state can accept political reform when it supports the state's goals.; This dissertation is organized around six major telecommunications policy decisions: policy-making structure, new market entry, foreign investment, interconnection policy, tariff policy, and new technologies---Internet Protocol telephony and "Little Smart" mobile service.
机译:技术变革和经济自由化会侵蚀威权政府的控制权吗?市场改革能导致政治改革吗?本文针对这些问题得出了有关中国电信服务市场的一些结论。首先,在过去的15年中,电信市场的部分开放增加了该行业的参与者数量,从而削弱了国家的控制力。另一方面,政府对控制通过这些网络流动的信息的兴趣导致市场准入有限,从而限制了竞争并保持了实质性的国家控制权。其次,尽管政府禁止,但技术新服务的增长证明了国家监管机构的脆弱性。在企业中,只有政治上的利益。小公司即使是技术先驱,在没有政治支持的情况下仍然处于边缘地位。第三,国家的权威薄弱,因为其最重要的决定是由意识形态驱动的,而不是反映实际的市场状况。因此,监管未能考虑对不遵守规则的公司和消费者的巨大诱因。自1980年代中国开始经济改革以来,有关经济改革对政治改革的影响的文献主要依靠不断增长的中产阶级,他们要求更多的声音作为民主化的关键。取而代之的是,本文提出一个更富有成果的研究领域可能是调查那些政治改革可以增强中国国家目标的领域。在电信服务政策中,经济改革和技术变革创造了一种环境,在这种环境中缺乏协商性,多元化的政策制定削弱了国家的权威。在这种情况下,中国政府是否会接受政治改革还有待观察。但是,在其他地区的发展,例如乡村选举,则表明中国只要支持国家的目标就可以接受政治改革。本文围绕六个主要的电信政策决策进行组织:决策结构,新市场准入,外国投资,互连政策,资费政策和新技术-Internet协议电话和“ Little Smart”移动服务。

著录项

  • 作者

    Wu, Irene S.;

  • 作者单位

    The Johns Hopkins University.;

  • 授予单位 The Johns Hopkins University.;
  • 学科 Political Science International Law and Relations.; History Asia Australia and Oceania.; Economics History.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2004
  • 页码 252 p.
  • 总页数 252
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 国际法;世界史;世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:44:07

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号