首页> 外文学位 >Quetelet's Average Men: Bureaucratic Science in Belgium at the End of Enlightenment 1796--1874.
【24h】

Quetelet's Average Men: Bureaucratic Science in Belgium at the End of Enlightenment 1796--1874.

机译:Quetelet的《普通人:启蒙运动结束后比利时的官僚科学》(1796--1874)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation presents an analysis of the professional life and thought of the Belgian polymath Adolphe Quetelet (1796-1874). In particular, it examines the intersection between Quetelet's social thought -- his proposed science of physique sociale -- and his work to create institutions of science in Belgium and Europe. Not only has this relationship not been recognized by Quetelet's many critics and interpreters, but a focus on these two interdependent aspects of his career helps answer a number of the most important questions concerning nineteenth-century science and social thought. Quetelet was raised in a broad intellectual tradition inspired by the Enlightenment that did not draw distinct boundaries between the arts and science, but the consensus of the eighteenth-century philosophes collapsed near the time he entered the professional scientific ranks of the United Kingdom of the Netherlands. Unlike many of his friends and colleagues, Quetelet easily adapted to this new form of scientific work, reforming Belgian institutions of science and raising the prestige of his country in Europe. At the same time as he revolutionized a national program of science, he created physique sociale, a science of human activity that attracted harsh criticism, but one that endured much longer than many other nineteenth-century social theories. Through exploring Quetelet's overlooked literary and institutional publications in addition to his more famous writings, this dissertation presents an examination of the one of the most interesting nineteenth-century savants and the history of his two average men.
机译:本文对比利时多名数学家阿道夫·奎特莱特(1796-1874)的职业生涯和思想进行了分析。尤其是,它考察了Quetelet的社会思想(他提出的形体社会科学)与他在比利时和欧洲创建科学机构的工作之间的交集。 Quetelet的许多批评家和口译员不仅不承认这种关系,而且着重于他职业生涯的这两个相互依存的方面有助于回答许多有关19世纪科学和社会思想的重要问题。 Quetelet在启蒙运动的启发下在广泛的知识传统中成长,该传统并未在艺术与科学之间划清界限,但是18世纪哲学家的共识在他进入荷兰联合王国的专业科学队伍时就崩溃了。 。与他的许多朋友和同事不同,奎特莱轻松地适应了这种新形式的科学工作,改革了比利时的科学机构,并提高了他的国家在欧洲的声望。在他革新国家科学计划的同时,他创立了社会体质学,这是一门人类活动科学,引起了严厉的批评,但是它的生存时间比许多其他十九世纪的社会学理论要长得多。通过探索Quetelet除他更著名的著作外,他还忽略了文学和机构刊物,本文提出了对19世纪最有趣的一位知识分子之一及其两个普通人的历史的考察。

著录项

  • 作者

    Donnelly, Kevin Padraic.;

  • 作者单位

    Brandeis University.;

  • 授予单位 Brandeis University.;
  • 学科 History European.;History of Science.;Sociology Theory and Methods.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 284 p.
  • 总页数 284
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:44:04

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号