首页> 外文学位 >Essays on liquidity costs in futures and options markets.
【24h】

Essays on liquidity costs in futures and options markets.

机译:关于期货和期权市场流动性成本的论文。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Scope and method of study. The study comprises three essays about the market microstructure of futures and options markets with the main emphasis on liquidity costs. The first essay determines the impact of the transition to electronic trading at the Kansas City Board of Trade (KCBT) wheat futures market. In this essay liquidity costs are estimated for side-by-side trading of open outcry and electronic wheat futures market at KCBT using intraday transaction prices. Factors such as daily volume, volume per trade, volatility and price clustering are used to explain the difference in liquidity costs in the two markets. The second essay attempts to guide the choice problem that agricultural producers face when selecting between futures and options markets to hedge their cash market position. Liquidity costs in KCBT wheat options and futures market are estimated and a new measure of liquidity costs in options markets is proposed. The third essay deals with the liquidity costs of stock and stock index futures and option markets at National Stock Exchange (NSE) of India. The liquidity costs are estimated using the new measure as well as several other measures previously developed in the literature.;Findings and conclusions. The main findings of the first essay are that the electronic wheat futures market has lower liquidity costs for all but the largest traders at KCBT. The key to continued existence of the open outcry market appears to be its ability to handle large orders. The second essay concludes that although, option contracts are often suggested to agricultural producers as an alternative to futures contracts to avoid margin calls, it costs more to trade an option. Regardless of the measure used, the liquidity costs in options markets were at least three times higher compared to the futures markets. A similar difference is found between the liquidity costs in stock and stock index futures and option markets at NSE, India in the third essay. The difference is more prominent in stock index futures and options compared to the individual stock futures and options.
机译:研究范围和方法。该研究包括三篇关于期货和期权市场的市场微观结构的文章,主要侧重于流动性成本。第一篇文章确定了过渡到电子交易对堪萨斯市贸易委员会(KCBT)小麦期货市场的影响。在本文中,使用盘中交易价格估算了在KCBT进行的公开喊价和电子小麦期货市场并排交易的流动性成本。日交易量,每笔交易量,波动率和价格聚类等因素可用来解释两个市场中流动性成本的差异。第二篇文章试图指导农业生产者在期货和期权市场之间进行选择以对冲其现金市场头寸时面临的选择问题。估计了KCBT小麦期权和期货市场中的流动性成本,并提出了一种衡量期权市场中流动性成本的新方法。第三篇文章讨论了印度国家证券交易所(NSE)的股票和股指期货以及期权市场的流动性成本。流动性成本是使用新方法以及以前在文献中开发的其他几种方法估算的。结论和结论。第一篇论文的主要发现是,除KCBT的最大交易商外,电子小麦期货市场的流动性成本较低。公开喊价市场持续存在的关键似乎在于其处理大订单的能力。第二篇文章得出的结论是,尽管经常向农业生产者建议使用期权合约来代替期货合约,以避免追加保证金的要求,但期权交易成本更高。不管采用哪种方法,期权市场的流动性成本至少比期货市场高三倍。在第三篇文章中,印度NSE的股票,股指期货和期权市场的流动性成本之间也发现了类似的差异。与单个股票期货和期权相比,股指期货和期权的差异更为明显。

著录项

  • 作者

    Shah, Samarth P.;

  • 作者单位

    Oklahoma State University.;

  • 授予单位 Oklahoma State University.;
  • 学科 Economics Agricultural.;Economics Theory.;Economics Finance.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 96 p.
  • 总页数 96
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号