首页> 外文学位 >Comparison of EEG preprocessing methods to improve the performance of the P300 speller .
【24h】

Comparison of EEG preprocessing methods to improve the performance of the P300 speller .

机译:比较脑电预处理方法来提高P300拼写器的性能。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The classification of P300 trials in electroencephalograhic (EEG) data is made difficult due the low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the P300 response. To overcome the low SNR of individual trials, it is common practice to average together many consecutive trials, which effectively diminishes the random noise. Unfortunately, when more repeated trials are required for applications such as the P300 speller, the communication rate is greatly reduced. Since the noise results from background brain activity and is inherent to the EEG recording methods, signal analysis techniques like blind source separation (BSS) have the potential to isolate the true source signal from the noise when using multi-channel recordings. This thesis provides a comparison of three BSS algorithms: independent component analysis (ICA), maximum noise fraction (MNF), and principal component analysis (PCA). In addition to this, the effects of adding temporal information to the original data, thereby creating time-delay embedded data, will be analyzed. The BSS methods can utilize this time-delay embedded data to find more complex spatio-temporal filters rather than the purely spatial filters found using the original data. One problem that is intrinsically tied to the application of BSS methods is the selection of the most relevant source components that are returned from each BSS algorithm. In this work, the following feature selection algorithms are adapted to be used for component selection: forward selection, ANOVA-based ranking, Relief, and recursive feature elimination (RFE). The performance metric used for all comparisons is the classification accuracy of P300 trials using a support vector machine (SVM) with a Gaussian kernel. The results show that although both BSS and feature selection algorithms can each cause significant performance gains, there is no added benefit from using both together. Feature selection is most beneficial when applied to a large number of electrodes, and BSS is most beneficial when applied to a smaller set of electrodes. Also, the results show that time-delay embedding is not beneficial for P300 classification.
机译:由于P300响应的信噪比(SNR)低,因此很难在EEG数据中对P300试验进行分类。为了克服单个试验的低信噪比,通常的做法是将许多连续的试验平均在一起,从而有效地减少了随机噪声。不幸的是,当需要对P300拼写器之类的应用程序进行更多重复试验时,通信速率会大大降低。由于噪声是由背景大脑活动引起的,并且是EEG记录方法所固有的,因此在使用多通道记录时,像盲源分离(BSS)这样的信号分析技术有可能将真实的源信号与噪声隔离开来。本文对三种BSS算法进行了比较:独立分量分析(ICA),最大噪声分数(MNF)和主分量分析(PCA)。除此之外,还将分析将时间信息添加到原始数据,从而创建延时嵌入数据的效果。 BSS方法可以利用此延时嵌入数据来查找更复杂的时空滤波器,而不是使用原始数据找到的纯空间滤波器。与BSS方法的应用本质上联系在一起的一个问题是,从每个BSS算法返回的最相关的源组件的选择。在这项工作中,以下特征选择算法适用于组件选择:正向选择,基于ANOVA的排名,救济和递归特征消除(RFE)。用于所有比较的性能指标是使用支持向量机(SVM)和高斯核的P300试验的分类精度。结果表明,尽管BSS和特征选择算法都可以显着提高性能,但同时使用它们并没有带来额外的好处。当应用于大量电极时,特征选择最有益,而当应用于较小电极组时,BSS最有益。而且,结果表明,延迟嵌入对于P300分类没有好处。

著录项

  • 作者

    Cashero, Zachary.;

  • 作者单位

    Colorado State University.;

  • 授予单位 Colorado State University.;
  • 学科 Computer Science.
  • 学位 M.S.
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 67 p.
  • 总页数 67
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号