首页> 外文学位 >The failure of reconciliation: The Byzantine experience at the Council of Ferrara -Florence (1438--1439)
【24h】

The failure of reconciliation: The Byzantine experience at the Council of Ferrara -Florence (1438--1439)

机译:和解失败:费拉拉议会-佛罗伦萨的拜占庭经历(1438--1439)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In 1439, at the ecclesiastical Council of Ferrara-Florence, representatives of the Byzantine empire and the Eastern Orthodox churches signed a reunion agreement with the Roman Catholic church. At the time, both parties accorded this council ecumenical status, meaning that its decisions were considered binding on the entire Christian church. The Eastern and Western churches had been in schism since the eleventh century. This council, therefore, was the successful culmination of a long process of negotiations to repair the division of the churches. Why then, did the Florentine union fail to take hold among the Byzantines, who were desperate to obtain western military assistance against the threat posed by the Ottoman Turks?;This dissertation attempts to answer this question by examining sources that illuminate the experience of the Byzantine delegation at the Council: the Greek Acts, the Description of Dorotheos of Mitylene, and the Memoirs of Sylvester Syropoulos. I begin with the historical background of the schism and subsequent attempts at reconciliation, as well as the political and ecclesiastical circumstances which made holding such a reunion council possible. Next, I analyze the Greek sources themselves, treating first the events in Ferrara and then the Council's transference to Florence. I conclude with a critique of the final negotiations and the union decree.;I contend that the reason why Mark of Ephesus and other Byzantines rejected the union was that the Council defined the faith entirely in accordance with Latin theology while failing to remain true to the Greek tradition. Therefore, when they criticized the unionists as followers of "Latinism," they were not, as has often been asserted, expressing an intractably chauvinistic ethnic prejudice. The anti-unionists asserted that given the methods and conclusions of the Council of Florence, it was they, rather than those who accepted this so-called ecumenical council, who were faithful to the seven true councils of the undivided Christian church. Thus, the failure of the Florentine union among the Byzantines was not motivated primarily by anti-Latin prejudice, but by a legitimate concern for preserving the integrity of the Orthodox faith.
机译:1439年,在费拉拉·佛罗伦斯(Ferrara-Florence)教会理事会上,拜占庭帝国和东正教教堂的代表与罗马天主教堂签署了重聚协议。当时,双方都赋予了该委员会大公地位,这意味着其决定被认为对整个基督教教会具有约束力。自十一世纪以来,东西方教堂一直处于分裂状态。因此,这个理事会是修复教会分裂的漫长谈判过程的成功结晶。那么,为什么佛罗伦萨工会未能在渴望获得西方军事援助以抵抗奥斯曼土耳其人构成的威胁的拜占庭人中占有一席之地?;本论文试图通过研究阐明拜占庭经验的资料来回答这个问题。理事会代表团:希腊法案,亚甲基多罗西奥斯的描述以及西尔维斯特·西罗普洛斯的回忆录。我从分裂的历史背景以及随后的和解尝试以及使举行这样的团聚委员会成为可能的政治和教会环境开始。接下来,我分析希腊的消息来源,首先讨论费拉拉的事件,然后讨论安理会对佛罗伦萨的移交。最后,我对最终谈判和联盟法令提出了批评。;我认为,以弗所马克和其他拜占庭人拒绝联盟的原因是,安理会完全按照拉丁神学对信仰进行了定义,但却未能忠实于伊斯兰教义。希腊的传统。因此,当他们批评工会主义者是“拉丁主义”的追随者时,他们并没有像通常所断言的那样表达出顽强的沙文主义的种族偏见。反工会主义者断言,鉴于佛罗伦萨委员会的方法和结论,他们是忠实于未分开的基督教会的七个真正委员会的,而不是那些接受所谓的大公会议的人。因此,拜占庭人之间的佛罗伦萨联合之所以失败,并不是主要出于反拉丁的偏见,而是出于维护东正教信仰完整性的合理考虑。

著录项

  • 作者单位

    University of California, Los Angeles.;

  • 授予单位 University of California, Los Angeles.;
  • 学科 Medieval history.;History Church.;Theology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2004
  • 页码 257 p.
  • 总页数 257
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号