首页> 外文学位 >Divine hiddenness and the challenge of inculpable nonbelief.
【24h】

Divine hiddenness and the challenge of inculpable nonbelief.

机译:神的隐藏和难以置信的不信的挑战。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Divine hiddenness is the idea that God is in some sense hidden or obscure. This dissertation responds to J.L. Schellenberg's argument, based on divine hiddenness and human reason, against the existence of God. Schellenberg argues that if a perfectly loving God exists, we would not expect to find such widespread nonbelief in God's existence. Given the amount of reasonable nonbelief in the world, Schellenberg argues that an agnostic ought to conclude that God does not exist rather than conclude that God is hidden. Schellenberg's argument has three major premises: (1) If there is a God, he is perfectly loving; (2) If a perfectly loving God exists, reasonable nonbelief does not occur; (3) Reasonable nonbelief occurs. I provide a theistic response to the argument from divine hiddenness in an attempt to offer the agnostic a reasonable reply that prevents an atheistic conclusion. In order to defeat the prima facie evidence for Schellenberg's argument, I first question the amount of reasonable nonbelief in an effort to reduce the evidential force of Schellenberg's third premise. This is followed by a consideration of possible defenses to challenge the second premise that if a perfectly loving God exists, reasonable nonbelief does not occur. Free-will defenses are considered, but I conclude that they are not sufficient as a response to the challenge that Schellenberg has developed. Instead, I argue that skeptical theism is a defense which can be successful in preventing an agnostic from being necessarily led, epistemically, to conclude that God does not exist. Finally, I develop a second defense motivated by concepts from Paul K. Moser that I take to be the most promising response to Schellenberg's argument from divine hiddenness. By casting the evidence for God in a new context, I conclude that the challenge that Schellenberg has developed can be overcome by providing a defense which shows that God, motivated by divine love, may in some sense be hidden so as to allow reasonable nonbelief to occur at least for a time.
机译:神性的隐藏是这样的观念,即上帝在某种意义上是隐藏的或晦涩的。这篇论文回应了J·L·谢伦伯格(J.L. Schellenberg)基于神圣隐性和人类理性的反对上帝存在的论点。谢伦贝格认为,如果存在一个完全慈爱的上帝,我们就不会期望在上帝的存在中发现如此广泛的不信。鉴于世界上存在大量合理的不信,谢伦贝格认为,不可知论者应该得出结论,认为神不存在,而不是得出神是隐藏的结论。谢伦伯格的论点有三个主要前提:(1)如果有上帝,他就是完美的爱人。 (2)如果存在一个完全慈爱的上帝,就不会发生合理的不信; (3)发生合理的不信。我对神的隐藏提出了一个有神论的回应,试图为不可知论者提供一个合理的答案,以防止无神论的结论。为了打消谢伦伯格论点的表面证据,我首先质疑合理的不相信的数量,以期减少谢伦伯格的第三个前提的证据力。其次是考虑可能的防御方法,以挑战第二个前提,即如果存在一个完全慈爱的上帝,就不会发生合理的不信。考虑了自由意志防御,但我得出的结论是,它们不足以应对Schellenberg提出的挑战。相反,我认为怀疑神论是一种防御,可以成功地阻止不可知论者在认识论上得出结论,认为神不存在。最后,我根据保罗·K·摩泽尔(Paul K. Moser)的观念发展了第二道防线,我认为这是对谢伦贝格(Schellenberg)神圣隐性论证的最有希望的回应。通过在新的背景下为上帝提供证据,我得出结论,谢伦贝格已经发展出的挑战可以通过提供一种辩护来克服,该辩护表明在某种意义上上帝可以出于神的爱的动机而被隐藏,从而允许合理的不信仰至少发生一次。

著录项

  • 作者

    Sokoloski, Matthew Ryan.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Arkansas.;

  • 授予单位 University of Arkansas.;
  • 学科 Religion Philosophy of.;Philosophy.;Epistemology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2012
  • 页码 231 p.
  • 总页数 231
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号