首页> 外文学位 >Dueling Dual Processes: Implicit and Explicit Decision-Making Processes Associated with Drinking Behavior Among Adolescents.
【24h】

Dueling Dual Processes: Implicit and Explicit Decision-Making Processes Associated with Drinking Behavior Among Adolescents.

机译:决斗双重过程:与青少年饮酒行为相关的内隐和显式决策过程。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The present study investigated the mediating effect of implicit alcohol associations and moderating effect of temptation coping strategies on the relationship between affective decision-making and alcohol use among adolescents. The design and interpretation of results followed the theoretically distinct, yet complementary dual process models of adolescent cognition and addictive behavior (Steinberg, 2007; Thush & Weirs, 2007). A total of 100 adolescents from a northwest urban high school were recruited to participate in a single session of assessment. After removal of 22 participants through data screening, the final sample ranged in age from 14--18 years (M=15.6; 54% female); ethnic representation included 60.4% Caucasian, 17.2% Multiracial, 9.6% Asian/Pacific Islander, 7.3% Hispanic, and 5.5% Black/African-American. Results indicated partial support for a developmentally informed, dual process model of alcohol use. Supporting H1, results of regression analyses indicated that affective decision-making predicted alcohol use (beta = -.33, t = -3.09, p .01). Affective decision-making did not predict implicit alcohol associations, and thus, H2 was not supported (beta = .00, t = .17, p = .86). Supporting H3, implicit alcohol associations were found to predict alcohol use (beta = .36, t = 3.35, p .01). Results of a Preacher and Hayes (2008) mediation analysis with bootstrapped resampling methods did not indicate support for the mediating effect of implicit alcohol associations on the relationship between affective decision-making and alcohol use (H4); the indirect effect was a1b1+a 2b2 = -.0281, CI = -.015 to .007. Utilizing a critical value of p .10 to determine a statistically significant moderation effect (Aguinis, 2004), results of regression analyses indicated that temptation coping significantly moderated the relationship between affective decision-making and alcohol use (beta = .001, t = 1.96, p = .05), supporting H5. Post-hoc multiple regression was conducted to investigate unique independent effects of study variables. Following the proposed pathways, alcohol use was significantly predicted by affective decision-making, implicit alcohol associations, and temptation coping F(3, 73) = 30.06, p .01. Together, these predictors accounted for 70% of variance in alcohol use. Findings replicate and extend previous research on adolescent drinking and may improve screening of at-risk youth.
机译:本研究调查了隐性酒精联想的中介作用和诱惑应对策略的调节作用对青少年情感决策与饮酒之间关系的影响。结果的设计和解释遵循青少年认知和成瘾行为的理论上截然不同但又互补的双重过程模型(Steinberg,2007; South&Weirs,2007)。总共招募了西北城市高中的100名青少年参加一次评估。通过数据筛选除去22名参与者后,最终样本的年龄范围为14--18岁(M = 15.6; 54%为女性);种族代表包括60.4%的白人,17.2%的多种族,9.6%的亚太裔,7.3%的西班牙裔和5.5%的黑人/非裔美国人。结果表明部分支持酒精的发展信息,双过程模型。支持H1的回归分析结果表明,情感决策可预测饮酒的使用(β= -.33,t = -3.09,p <.01)。情感决策无法预测内隐的酒精关联,因此不支持H2(β= 0.00,t = .17,p = .86)。支持H3,发现隐性酒精关联可以预测酒精使用(β= 0.36,t = 3.35,p <0.01)。 Preacher和Hayes(2008)用自举重采样方法进行的调解分析结果并未表明支持隐式酒精联想对情感决策与饮酒之间的关系的调节作用(H4)。间接影响是a1b1 + a 2b2 = -.0281,CI = -.015至.007。利用p <.10的临界值来确定统计学上显着的调节作用(Aguinis,2004年),回归分析的结果表明,诱惑应对显着缓解了情感决策与饮酒之间的关系(β= .001,t = 1.96,p = .05),支持H5。进行事后多元回归以研究研究变量的独特独立影响。按照提议的途径,通过情感决策,内隐的酒精联想和诱惑应对F(3,73)= 30.06,p <.01,可以显着预测酒精的使用。这些预测因素加在一起占酒精使用量差异的70%。研究结果重复并扩展了以前关于青少年饮酒的研究,可能会改善对处于危险中的青年的筛查。

著录项

  • 作者

    Welton, Sarah Rachelle.;

  • 作者单位

    Seattle Pacific University.;

  • 授予单位 Seattle Pacific University.;
  • 学科 Psychology Clinical.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2012
  • 页码 120 p.
  • 总页数 120
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号