Götz von Berlichingen, Egmont , and Torquato Tasso. C'/> Goethe and the Renaissance court: History, politics, and individualism.
首页> 外文学位 >Goethe and the Renaissance court: History, politics, and individualism.
【24h】

Goethe and the Renaissance court: History, politics, and individualism.

机译:歌德和文艺复兴时期的法院:历史,政治和个人主义。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation focuses on Goethe's representation of sixteenth-century politics by analyzing his dramas Götz von Berlichingen, Egmont , and Torquato Tasso. Combining different theoretical approaches, I adopt a new perspective in studying the interplay of Goethe's aesthetic, historical, social, and political thought. By the eighteenth century, court criticism, which flourished during the Renaissance, has become a part of political discourse. In Germany, this court criticism manifested itself in the cultural revolt of the Sturm und Drang, which I call Oppositionsästhetik because it attacked the aesthetic norms that dominated German courts.;In the analysis of the first play, I examine the conflict between the nascent absolutist court and the autonomous individual, emphasizing the interaction of past and present in creating a cultural memory. While Goethe attacks the tyranny of Philip II in Egmont, his negative representation of the middle and lower classes makes the tragedy as much about social hegemony as about revolt against absolutism. This contradiction in the play is a facet of the incongruity of criticizing the court and being there at the same time. While Götz and Egmont eschew and resist the court, Tasso's dependence on a patron and insistence that his genius puts him on an equal footing with the duke leads to his crisis. This confrontation between an artist and his patron is the principal motif in the autobiography of Benvenuto Cellini, which Goethe translated.;Goethe's view of the Middle Ages and the Renaissance as it is presented in these plays and in his commentary to Cellini's Vita is diametrically opposed to Jacob Burckhardt's thesis of Renaissance individualism. Individualism, according to Goethe, had already existed in the Middle Ages; the rise of the absolutist court threatened it during the Renaissance. I maintain that Burckhardt suffered from an anxiety of influence caused by his application to the Renaissance of ideas and concepts that originated or were first used to speak of the Middle Ages. This includes Justus Möser's metaphoric use of Kunstwerk and Arthur Schopenhauer's medieval principium individuationis. However, the greatest anxiety of influence resulted from his life-long struggle with Goethe.
机译:本文通过对歌德的戏剧Götzvon Berlichingen,Egmont Torquato Tasso 的分析,着重于歌德对十六世纪政治的代表。结合不同的理论方法,我在研究歌德美学,历史,社会和政治思想之间的相互作用时采用了新的视角。到18世纪,文艺复兴时期盛行的法院批评已成为政治论述的一部分。在德国,这种法院的批评体现在 Sturm und Drang 的文化反叛中,我称之为Oppositionsästhetik,因为它攻击了主导德国法院的审美规范。在第一部剧本的分析中,我研究了新生的专制法院与自治个人之间的冲突,强调了过去和现在在创造文化记忆中的相互作用。歌德在 Egmont 抨击菲利普二世的暴政时,他对中下层阶级的否定表示使悲剧既涉及社会霸权,也涉及对反专制的反抗。剧中的这种矛盾是对法院的批评和同时存在的矛盾之处。当戈茨和埃格蒙特回避并抗拒法院时,塔索对赞助人的依赖以及他天才使他与公爵处于平等地位的坚持导致了他的危机。艺术家与赞助人之间的这种对抗是本韦努托·切利尼自传的主要主题,歌德翻译了该自传;歌德对中世纪和文艺复兴的看法在这些剧本以及他对切利尼的《斜体》的评论中都有介绍。 与雅各布·伯克哈特(Jacob Burckhardt)的文艺复兴主义个人主义理论截然相反。根据歌德的观点,个人主义已经存在于中世纪。在文艺复兴时期,专制法院的崛起威胁到它的发展。我坚持认为,伯克哈特(Burckhardt)受其对文艺复兴的影响而产生了焦虑,这些思想和观念起源于或最初是用来谈论中世纪的。其中包括JustusMöser对 Kunstwerk 的隐喻用法和Arthur Schopenhauer的中世纪 individuationis 。然而,影响力最大的忧虑是他与歌德终生奋斗的结果。

著录项

  • 作者

    Derwiche Djazaerly, Yasser.;

  • 作者单位

    Stanford University.;

  • 授予单位 Stanford University.;
  • 学科 Literature Germanic.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2004
  • 页码 331 p.
  • 总页数 331
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号