首页> 外文学位 >Xu Wei's 'Zahua': A study of genres (China).
【24h】

Xu Wei's 'Zahua': A study of genres (China).

机译:徐渭的“杂话”:体裁研究(中国)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation explores an overlooked yet critical issue in the history of art: Xu Wei's (1521--93) use of the special pictorial genre to which he applies the genre-label za (miscellaneous). This interesting genre-label leads us to Xu Wei's criticism of the classification system of art and culture in his day. In brief, za is to be seen as the antithesis of jidacheng (the "great synthesis"); za is heterodox and jidacheng is always orthodox in the Chinese context. The two kinds thus function as two extreme modes of cultural and artistic reorganization. Za can be regarded as a kind of "cultural miscegenation," whereas jidacheng is a kind of "cultural endogamy" within the network of canonical families.; Cultural battles between them start in the Warring States Period (ca. 403--221 BCE) in philosophical debates and then gradually extend into the exegesis of the Classics and into the field of literature. In the mid-Ming (around the 16th century), the art of painting becomes the final battlefield between za and jidacheng, in the form of "genre and counter-genre": the zahua (miscellaneous flowers and plants) genre versus the mountain-and-water (landscape) genre. Xu Wei reshapes the zahua genre and in so doing launches a frontal attack on classicism in the genres that aim for jidacheng . Through a new style and composition, Xu Wei presents a seriocomic social and aesthetic criticism and, by the same token, a new vision of a society, one in which multiple voices can make themselves heard, opening a new forum for later Individualist artists. Because of the nature of Xu Wei's art, it is natural to take an interdisciplinary and comparative approach. Artistic and cultural reorganizations happen everyday and everywhere, and Xu Wei's work, which reveals subtle clues hidden in the complex inherited classification systems of his time, enables us to see how diverse cultural currents conflict, separate, or merge within a shared context.
机译:本论文探讨了艺术史上一个被忽视但又至关重要的问题:徐炜(1521--93)使用特殊的绘画风格,并在其上应用了类型标签za(杂类)。这个有趣的体裁标签使我们想到了徐渭在他时代对艺术和文化分类体系的批评。简而言之,za被视为吉大成的对立面(“大合成”);在中国语境中,za是异教徒,而吉大成始终是正统派。因此,这两种是文化和艺术重组的两种极端模式。 Za可以被视为一种“文化错配”,而吉大成则是规范家庭网络中的一种“文化内婚”。它们之间的文化斗争始于战国时期(约公元前403--221年)的哲学辩论,然后逐渐扩展到经典的释经和文学领域。在明代中期(约16世纪),绘画艺术以“流派和反流派”的形式成为za和jidacheng之间的最后战场:zahua(杂花和植物)流派与山区相比-和水(风景)类型。徐re重塑了杂耍风格,从而激起了以吉大成为目标的古典主义的正面攻击。徐炜通过一种新的风格和构图,提出了对浆液性社会和美学的批评,并以同样的方式提出了一种社会的新视野,在这种视野中可以表达多种声音,为后来的个人主义艺术家打开了一个新的论坛。由于徐炜艺术的天性,采用跨学科和比较性的方法是很自然的。艺术和文化的重组无处不在,而且徐渭的作品揭示了隐藏在他那个时代复杂的继承分类系统中的微妙线索,使我们能够看到多样化的文化潮流如何在共享的语境中发生冲突,分离或融合。

著录项

  • 作者

    Yen, Shou-chih Isaac.;

  • 作者单位

    Yale University.;

  • 授予单位 Yale University.;
  • 学科 Art History.; Anthropology Cultural.; History Asia Australia and Oceania.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2004
  • 页码 545 p.
  • 总页数 545
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 艺术史、艺术思想史;人类学;世界史;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:43:28

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号