首页> 外文学位 >Political ecologies: The contingency of nature in American romantic thought.
【24h】

Political ecologies: The contingency of nature in American romantic thought.

机译:政治生态学:美国浪漫主义思想中自然的偶然性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

"Political Ecologies: The Contingency of Nature in American Romantic Thought" articulates a turn to materialist thought in the writing of Henry David Thoreau, Frederick Douglass, and Walt Whitman, tracing the emergence of a materialist alternative to the ahistorical and idealized account of nature conventionally associated with romantic thought.;Widely considered the wellspring of the modern environmental imaginary, the romantic movement has been championed by literary ecocritics for its valorization of intuition over empirical methods of knowledge. On this view, romantic intuition is a peculiarly inspired mode of perception (typified by Emerson's "transparent eye-ball" or Shelley's "all-penetrating gaze") by which we are able to access the essence and intrinsic virtue of natural order---dimensions which escape the reductive and instrumentalizing vision of nature attributed to scientific empiricism. This view thus treats both nature and intuition as common denominators of an otherwise diverse population, representing respectively a shared reality and the universal faculty by which we may know it. However I argue that this received narrative of romantic ecological thought has obscured the ways in which dissent from this consensus view forms the crux of work by canonical authors of the American romantic period. As I demonstrate, far from renouncing science for a universal intuitionism, Thoreau, Douglass, and Whitman draw upon mid-century biological discourses to produce accounts of intuition which relinquish its disembodied and universalizing function, exploring instead the possibility that intuitive perception yields insights as divergent as the bodies and brains from which they spring. These efforts to theorize biological difference in turn allow the four authors I treat to imagine a natural order that is not ineluctably harnessed to moral truth, and thus I argue that their texts develop a materialist romanticism which substantially dismantles the reified and morally idealized account of "Nature" currently cited as definitional of romantic texts. In the alternative view that emerges, a view I term "political ecology," Thoreau, Douglass, Whitman attempt to re-conceive of nature as a material system at once generative of, and shaped by, the contingencies of human history.
机译:“政治生态学:美国浪漫主义思想中自然的偶然性”阐明了亨利·戴维·梭罗,弗雷德里克·道格拉斯和沃尔特·惠特曼的著作中对唯物主义思想的转向,追溯了传统上对历史主义和理想化的自然主义的唯物主义者的出现浪漫运动被广泛认为是现代环境假想的源泉,由于其对经验知识的直觉的重视,受到文学生态批评家的拥护。按照这种观点,浪漫的直觉是一种特殊的启发性的感知方式(典型的是爱默生的“透明眼球”或雪莱的“穿透性凝视”),通过这种方式,我们能够获得自然秩序的本质和内在美德---逃避归因于科学经验主义的自然还原性和工具化视野的维度。因此,这种观点将自然和直觉都视为本来就多样化的人口的共同点,分别代表着一个共同的现实和我们所知道的普世才能。但是,我认为,这种对浪漫主义生态思想的认可掩盖了从这种共识观点出发的异议形成美国浪漫主义时期经典著作的症结所在的方式。正如我所展示的那样,梭罗,道格拉斯和惠特曼并没有放弃科学来追求普适的直觉主义,而是利用了世纪中叶的生物学话语来产生直觉的解释,从而放弃了其无形和普适的功能,而是探索了直觉感知产生不同见解的可能性。就像它们从中诞生的身体和大脑一样。通过对生物学差异进行理论化的这些努力,我所认为的四位作者可以想象一种自然的,并非不可避免地利用道德真理的秩序,因此,我认为他们的著作发展了唯物主义的浪漫主义,从根本上消除了对“目前引用“自然”作为浪漫文本的定义。在出现的另一种观点中,我称之为“政治生态学”的观点是梭罗,道格拉斯,惠特曼试图将自然重新构想为人类历史偶然性产生并受其塑造的物质系统。

著录项

  • 作者

    Ellis, Cristin E. L.;

  • 作者单位

    The Johns Hopkins University.;

  • 授予单位 The Johns Hopkins University.;
  • 学科 History United States.;Literature American.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2012
  • 页码 161 p.
  • 总页数 161
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号