首页> 外文学位 >Fishing for Ballots: Domestic Institutions, Common Pool Resource Problems, and Compliance with International Environmental Regimes.
【24h】

Fishing for Ballots: Domestic Institutions, Common Pool Resource Problems, and Compliance with International Environmental Regimes.

机译:钓鱼投票:国内机构,共同的游泳池资源问题以及对国际环境制度的遵守情况。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Governments have attempted a variety of measures in the last 70 years to protect international common-pool resources. Frequently, these measures involve international treaties which commit the signatories to the protection of the common-pool resource through restrictions on use: either quotas or targets. However, one sees demonstrable empiric variation in compliance with these treaties.;Why does cooperation with international treaties vary? One factor might involve domestic special interests; deviation from a common-pool resource management regime benefits some minority of people in the near term, usually regular users of the regime. It is clear that small, well-organized groups can receive favors from the government. But under what conditions will governments grant favors to special interests? Do electoral systems matter? Previous work has offered contradictory theories; empirical evidence, depending on the issue area, is muddled.;This dissertation seeks to determine the scope conditions under which previous theories apply through the concept of marginal costs. Some favors for special interests are costly, whether in terms of future support from voters, or in terms of direct budgetary cost. Others are cheap; perhaps they cost a government nothing, or voters do not notice.;Three empirical domains are examined: the European Union's Common Fisheries Policy, where marginal costs are anticipated to be low; the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization, where marginal costs are anticipated to be very low; and the Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution, where marginal costs are anticipated to vary due to weather patterns in Europe.;The theory is tested using three separate datasets newly-constructed from archival research. In all three domains, the quantitative evidence is supplemented with short qualitative case studies and elite interviews. The results show that states in low-marginal-cost situations provide private goods to special interests in different ways than states in high-marginal-cost situations. A concluding chapter offers possible solutions to problems facing international common-pool resource regimes and directions for future research.
机译:在过去的70年中,各国政府已尝试采取多种措施来保护国际公共游泳池资源。通常,这些措施涉及国际条约,这些条约通过限制使用(配额或目标)来使签署国承诺保护公共资源。但是,人们看到在遵守这些条约方面出现了明显的经验差异。为什么与国际条约的合作有所不同?一个因素可能涉及国内特殊利益。在短期内偏离公共资源管理制度将使少数人受益,通常是该制度的定期使用者。显然,组织良好的小型团体可以得到政府的青睐。但是,政府将在什么条件下给予特殊利益青睐?选举制度重要吗?先前的工作提出了相互矛盾的理论;经验证据,取决于问题领域,是混乱的。本论文试图通过边际成本的概念来确定先前理论适用的范围条件。无论是从选民们的未来支持还是直接预算成本方面,对特殊利益的某些支持都是代价昂贵​​的。其他的很便宜;也许,他们花了政府一分钱,还是选民们没有注意到。;研究了三个经验领域:欧盟的共同渔业政策,预计边际成本较低;西北大西洋渔业组织,预计边际成本非常低;以及《远距离越境空气污染公约》,由于欧洲的天气模式,边际成本预计会有所不同。;该理论使用了由档案研究新构建的三个独立的数据集进行了测试。在这三个领域中,定量证据都辅以简短的定性案例研究和精英访谈。结果表明,与高边际成本情况下的国家相比,低边际成本情况下的国家以不同的方式向特殊利益提供私人商品。最后一章为国际公共池资源制度所面临的问题以及未来研究的方向提供了可能的解决方案。

著录项

  • 作者

    Kirkpatrick, Andrew B.;

  • 作者单位

    Emory University.;

  • 授予单位 Emory University.;
  • 学科 Environmental Law.;European Studies.;Political Science International Relations.;Political Science General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2012
  • 页码 177 p.
  • 总页数 177
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号