首页> 外文学位 >Pilgrims, holy places, and the multi -confessional empire: Russian policy toward the Ottoman Empire under Tsar Nicholas I, 1825--1855
【24h】

Pilgrims, holy places, and the multi -confessional empire: Russian policy toward the Ottoman Empire under Tsar Nicholas I, 1825--1855

机译:朝圣者,圣地和多臣制帝国:沙皇尼古拉一世领导下的俄罗斯对奥斯曼帝国的政策,1825--1855年

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In the minds of most historians of imperial Russia, the reign of Tsar Nicholas I (r. 1825--1855) is closely linked with the ideological slogan known as Official Nationality. Consisting of three principles---Orthodoxy, Autocracy, and Nationality---and promoted by Russian officials as state doctrine beginning in the early 1830s, Official Nationality is generally considered the guiding ideology of both domestic and foreign policy under Nicholas I. Thus scholars have seen Russia's foreign policy toward the Ottoman Empire in this period as an expression of the tsar's commitment to Orthodoxy as a foundation of the Russian state.;This dissertation argues that in fact Russia had no uniform "Orthodox policy" during this period: Russian officials did not only, or even primarily, rely on Orthodoxy to extend Russia's influence into the Ottoman Empire.;While most studies of Russo-Ottoman relations rely on the perspectives of ruling elites in St. Petersburg and Istanbul, this dissertation also examines the correspondence of Russian and Ottoman officials posted in the Russian-ruled Caucasus and the Ottoman regions of Syria and Palestine. These sources reveal that policies favored by leading officials in St. Petersburg---such as restricting Muslim pilgrimage from the Caucasus to Mecca, and using the Orthodox Churches of Syria and Palestine as a base for Russian influence there---were not always embraced or executed by Russian officials on the ground in those regions. In the context of imperial rivalries in predominantly Muslim parts of Syria and Palestine, many saw the presence of Muslim pilgrims from Russia in the region as crucial to the establishment of Russian influence there. Finally this dissertation argues that Tsar Nicholas I's 1853 invasion of the Ottoman Empire on the pretext of "defending" Orthodoxy---the event that triggered the Crimean War---was not the culmination of a well-established "Orthodox policy," but rather marked a sharp break from the ongoing efforts of officials within Nicholas's government to promote the tsar as "protector" of many faiths, and to cultivate the loyalties of Ottoman subjects across confessional and sectarian lines. (Abstract shortened by UMI.).
机译:在大多数帝国俄国历史学家的心中,沙皇尼古拉一世(r。1825--1855)的统治与被称为官方国籍的思想口号紧密相关。由正统,专制和国籍这三项原则组成,并由俄罗斯官员于1830年代初开始作为国家学说推广,在尼古拉斯一世时期,官方国籍被普遍视为国内和外交政策的指导思想。曾将俄罗斯这段时期对奥斯曼帝国的外交政策视为沙皇对东正教作为俄罗斯国家基础的承诺的表达。;本论文认为,实际上俄罗斯在此期间没有统一的“东正教政策”:俄罗斯官员不仅,或者甚至主要是依靠东正教将俄罗斯的影响力扩展到奥斯曼帝国。虽然大多数俄罗斯-奥斯曼关系研究都依赖于圣彼得堡和伊斯坦布尔统治精英的观点,但本文也考察了俄罗斯对奥斯曼帝国统治的看法。俄罗斯和奥斯曼帝国的官员在俄罗斯统治的高加索地区以及叙利亚和巴勒斯坦的奥斯曼帝国地区驻守。这些消息表明,圣彼得堡的主要官员所偏爱的政策(例如,限制穆斯林从高加索朝圣麦加,以及将叙利亚和巴勒斯坦的东正教教堂作为俄罗斯在那里影响的基础)并不总是被接受。或由俄罗斯官员在这些地区的地面处决。在主要是叙利亚和巴勒斯坦穆斯林地区的帝国对抗中,许多人认为来自俄罗斯的穆斯林朝圣者在该地区的存在对建立俄罗斯的影响力至关重要。最后,本文论证说,沙皇尼古拉斯一世于1853年以“捍卫”东正教(引发克里米亚战争)为借口,入侵了奥斯曼帝国,这并不是建立完善的“东正教政策”的顶峰,而是相反,这标志着尼古拉斯政府内部官员为促进沙皇成为许多信仰的“保护者”,以及在悔和宗派界培养奥斯曼帝国的臣民而做出的重大努力。 (摘要由UMI缩短。)。

著录项

  • 作者

    Kane, Eileen M.;

  • 作者单位

    Princeton University.;

  • 授予单位 Princeton University.;
  • 学科 Modern history.;Middle Eastern history.;European history.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2005
  • 页码 176 p.
  • 总页数 176
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号