首页> 外文学位 >Socializing children for autonomy: Expanding the legal institution of family and mandating autonomy-enabling education.
【24h】

Socializing children for autonomy: Expanding the legal institution of family and mandating autonomy-enabling education.

机译:为儿童争取自治的社会:扩大家庭的法律制度,并要求进行自主教育。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Liberalism has struggled with the question of what is to be done when subgroups within liberal society assert their right to espouse illiberal values. Feminist scholars have drawn attention to the way some illiberal subcultures, often consisting of religious groups exercising their right to practice their religion, openly reject the full equality of women and accept gender hierarchy as part of their way of life. According to Rawlsian political liberalism, gender hierarchy within the family is permitted by justice so long as it "is indeed fully voluntary." What I want to ask, then, is under what circumstances might we feel reasonably secure that such a choice is indeed fully voluntary? What obligations does a just society have to ensure that these circumstances obtain? Which methods of implementation might such a society adopt, consistent with liberal principles, when arranging its basic institutions?; I suggest that the circumstances in which we might feel reasonably assured that adults are making choices that reflect their genuine values and preferences are ones in which every child is guaranteed sufficient future freedom to allow her to evaluate and accept, reject, or modify her values, preferences, and conception of the good. My recommended means of providing this guarantee are twofold. The first prong consists in providing each child with an environment in which a variety of family forms are socially approved, so that her conception of the good does not become prematurely and unreflectively established according to its compatibility with an expected role in a traditional, heterosexual couple form of family. The second prong would require state-mandated autonomy-enabling education for all children. This education would undertake to ensure that children adequately develop their autonomy (including the capacity competently to evaluate and choose among conceptions of the good) and that they are exposed to a significant variety of valuable ways of life.; I reject Rawls's political liberalism as insufficient for grounding a government obligation to promote gender equality and to ensure children's future freedom. Instead, I embrace a Mill-influenced comprehensive liberalism.
机译:自由主义一直困扰着一个问题,那就是当自由社会中的各族群维护其拥护自由价值观念的权利时该怎么办。女权主义学者引起了人们的关注,即一些通常由行使宗教信仰权的宗教团体组成的非法亚文化的方式,公开拒绝妇女的完全平等,并接受性别等级制度作为其生活方式的一部分。根据罗尔斯的政治自由主义,只要“确实是完全自愿的”,司法允许家庭内部的性别等级制。那么,我想问的是,在什么情况下我们可以合理地确信这种选择确实是完全自愿的?公正的社会必须承担哪些义务来确保获得这些情况?这样一个社会在安排其基本制度时,可以按照自由原则采取哪些实施方法?我建议,在这样的情况下,我们可以合理确定成年人正在做出反映其真正价值观和偏好的选择,在这种情况下,可以保证每个孩子将来都有足够的自由,使她能够评估,接受,拒绝或修改其价值观,喜好和好的观念。我建议的提供此保证的方法有两个方面。第一项任务是为每个孩子提供一个可以通过各种家庭形式获得社会认可的环境,从而使她对商品的观念不会因其与传统异性恋夫妇的预期角色的相容性而过早地和反省地确立。家庭形式。第二个分支将要求所有儿童接受国家授权的自治教育。这项教育将确保儿童充分发展自主权(包括有能力评估和理解商品概念的能力),并确保他们能够接触到各种各样有价值的生活方式。我拒绝罗尔斯的政治自由主义不足以使政府有义务促进性别平等并确保儿童未来的自由。取而代之的是,我接受了一个受到米尔影响的全面自由主义。

著录项

  • 作者单位

    University of Pennsylvania.;

  • 授予单位 University of Pennsylvania.;
  • 学科 Philosophy.; Womens Studies.; Education Philosophy of.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2005
  • 页码 244 p.
  • 总页数 244
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 哲学理论;社会学;教育;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:42:57

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号