首页> 外文学位 >Beyond the next generation: Challenges for the future of United States environmental policy.
【24h】

Beyond the next generation: Challenges for the future of United States environmental policy.

机译:超越下一代:美国环境政策未来的挑战。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Policies governing natural resources reach back to the earliest days of the United States, but the distinctive shape of the environmental policy domain emerged in the 1970s with passage of seminal pieces of legislation. During the 1990s, calls for a "next generation" of policy spawned a decade of experimentation with alternatives to so-called "command and control" approaches, most notably relying on market-based or negotiation-based performance incentives. No consensus has emerged that these experiments constitute a satisfactory next generation paradigm, and calls for new policy approaches continue.; The notion that environmental policy is at a crossroads is widely held, and I argue that it reflects a focus on increasing efficiency and performance without an overarching vision of intended outcomes or, in other words, a failure to fully articulate what environmental policies should be about. In light of new issues vying for attention, evolving relationships among science, society, and policy-making, and the emergence of globalization, I propose the need for a normative decision, undertaken collectively within society, about whether to limit the domain to first-generation goals of pollution control and prevention or expand it to include new issues that are conceptually more abstract, geographically more diffuse, and more likely to be inconveniently enmeshed with lifestyle. The sense of being at a crossroads reflects the reality that choosing between these diverging visions constitutes more than a choice between political strategies.; The historical and philosophical premises of the policy domain make expansion likely, but not easy. I offer case studies of efforts by a federal agency to enhance its policy-relevance, of fragmented discourses on water scarcity, and of the dilemma posed by Great Lakes diversions to illustrate that an expanded policy domain would require new mechanisms to ensure verifiably science-based, yet socially meaningful civic-centered decision-making. Global dimensions of public decision-making require the legitimization of coordinated multi-scalar (i.e., local, national, and global) governance regimes that still reserve authentic democratic control over national and local decisions. A reformed, more robust national policy domain is needed that can identify public environmental goods to be enjoyed by all citizens and play a harmonizing role in a multi-scalar context.
机译:管理自然资源的政策可以追溯到美国最早的时期,但随着开创性的立法的通过,环境政策领域的独特形式出现于1970年代。在1990年代,对“下一代”政策的呼吁催生了十年的试验,以替代所谓的“命令和控制”方法,尤其是依靠基于市场或基于谈判的绩​​效激励措施。这些实验构成了令人满意的下一代范例,尚未达成共识,并且继续要求采取新的政策方法。关于环境政策正处于十字路口的观点被广泛使用,我认为这反映了对提高效率和绩效的关注,而没有对预期结果的总体看法,或者换句话说,没有充分阐明环境政策应该是什么。 。鉴于有新的问题在引起关注,科学,社会与决策之间的关系不断发展,以及全球化的兴起,我建议有必要在社会内部集体做出关于是否将领域限制为第一手的规范决策。污染控制和预防的世代目标或将其扩展到包括概念上更抽象,地理上更分散且更可能与生活方式产生不便的新问题。处在十字路口的感觉反映了这样一个现实:在这些不同的观点之间进行选择不仅仅是在政治策略之间进行选择。政策领域的历史和哲学前提使扩张成为可能,但并不容易。我提供了一些案例研究,这些案例研究涉及联邦机构为增强其政策相关性而做出的努力,关于水资源短缺的零散论述以及大湖区改道带来的困境,以说明扩大的政策领域将需要新的机制来确保可验证地基于科学,但对以公民为中心的社会决策具有重大意义。公共决策的全球范围要求将协调的多标量(即地方,国家和全球)治理制度合法化,这些制度仍保留对国家和地方决策的真正民主控制。需要一个经过改革的,更强大的国家政策领域,该领域可以确定所有公民都可以享用的公共环境商品,并在多层面环境中发挥协调作用。

著录项

  • 作者

    Graffy, Elisabeth A.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Wisconsin - Madison.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Wisconsin - Madison.;
  • 学科 Political Science General.; Sociology General.; Law.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2005
  • 页码 158 p.
  • 总页数 158
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 政治理论;社会学;法律;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号