首页> 外文学位 >Political-Media Relations and the Power of Party-Based Regimes.
【24h】

Political-Media Relations and the Power of Party-Based Regimes.

机译:政治媒体关系和基于政党的政权。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation analyzes the ways in which political parties influence mass media content. It specifically analyzes the partisan composition of government -- whether Congress and the Presidency are controlled by one party, the other, or whether control is split between them -- and how the composition of government influences how media organizations report public policy and American politics. This study examines a variety of models that try to explain media bias, including those claiming that journalists share a liberal media bias, a pluralistic bias (in which room exists for all types of state and non-state actors in reports), a hegemonic (or pro-business) bias, or a pro-government, pro-official source bias (known as "indexing") more generally. This study finds evidence that the pro-official source (indexing) bias is the strongest model of the four for explaining how journalists report on public policy issues. More specifically, the composition of government (which parties control Congress and the Presidency) is the strongest factor influencing how media outlets report political conflicts and debates as related to public policy.;The pluralistic model of bias is mostly rejected in reporting, since state actors (over non-state actors) overwhelmingly dominate stories, although evidence of a balance between state and non-state actors is found on the op-ed pages of major newspapers. The liberal media bias model is roundly disconfirmed in this study, with little to no evidence that journalists regularly tailor their reporting to fit a liberal agenda. The hegemonic bias model is also rejected in terms of accounting for the ways in which reporters cover stories related to public policy. Hegemonic (pro-business) forces, however, may play a role in influencing not so much what appears in stories, but what does not appear, due to the advertising pressures exerted on editors to leave out of stories those views that are critical of business interests altogether.
机译:本文分析了政党影响大众传媒内容的方式。它专门分析了政府的党派组成-国会和总统府是由一个政党控制,还是由另一方控制,或者政府控制权是否在政党之间分开-以及政府的组成如何影响媒体组织如何报道公共政策和美国政治。这项研究调查了各种试图解释媒体偏见的模型,包括那些声称记者共有自由媒体偏见,多元偏见(报告中存在所有类型的国家和非国家行为者的空间),霸权主义(或亲企业)偏见,或亲政府,亲官方来源偏见(称为“索引编制”)。这项研究发现有证据表明,在解释记者如何报道公共政策问题方面,赞成官方消息来源(索引)的偏见是这四种模式中最强的模型。更具体地说,政府的组成(由哪个党控制国会和总统职位)是影响媒体如何报道与公共政策有关的政治冲突和辩论的最重要因素。;由于国家行为者的存在,偏见的多元化模式在报告中大多被拒绝尽管在主要报纸的专栏文章中发现了国家与非国家行为者之间平衡的证据,但(主要针对非国家行为者)还是压倒一切。自由媒体偏见模型在本研究中被完全否定,几乎没有证据表明记者会定期调整他们的报道以适应自由议程。在解释记者报道与公共政策有关的故事的方式时,霸权偏见模型也被拒绝了。但是,霸权(亲商业)力量可能对新闻中出现的内容的影响不大,而对故事中没有出现的内容的影响却不大,这是由于施加在编辑上的广告压力使故事中那些对业务至关重要的观点不予关注完全感兴趣。

著录项

  • 作者

    DiMaggio, Anthony Ross.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Illinois at Chicago.;

  • 授予单位 University of Illinois at Chicago.;
  • 学科 Political Science General.;Mass Communications.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2012
  • 页码 248 p.
  • 总页数 248
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 遥感技术;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号