首页> 外文学位 >Change in the U.S. Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy toward India (1998--2005): Accommodating the Anomaly.
【24h】

Change in the U.S. Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy toward India (1998--2005): Accommodating the Anomaly.

机译:美国对印度核不扩散政策的变化(1998--2005):应对异常现象。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

For more than three decades, the U.S. prohibited the transfer of advanced nuclear technologies to India---a nonsignatory of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT). In 1998, in an unprecedented challenge to the nuclear nonproliferation regime, India crossed the nuclear threshold and declared itself a nuclear weapon state, inviting the wrath of Washington in the form of sanctions. Yet, in 2005, within seven years of India's nuclear crossover, the Bush administration pledged to resume full civilian nuclear cooperation with India, the nuclear outlier. The 2005 U.S.-India nuclear cooperation agreement aroused sharp reactions and unleashed a storm of controversy. This study utilises regime theory to investigate whether the U.S.-India nuclear agreement undermines, or brings India within, the nuclear nonproliferation regime. This research examines the evolution of the change in U.S. nuclear nonproliferation policy toward India.;India's quest for advanced technology posed a persistent challenge to the NPT-centric nuclear nonproliferation regime. Despite the imposition of technological embargoes, the U.S. failed to prevent India's nuclear breakout in 1998, and was unable to deal effectively with the postproliferation challenge posed by India. In the changed global nuclear scenario of the 21st century, especially after the terrorist attacks on the U.S. in September 2001, Washington realised that leaving India outside the nonproliferation regime was not beneficial to international security. This research concludes that the 2005 U.S.-India civilian nuclear accord did not provide unlimited technological access to nuclear India, but was congruent with the principles and norms of the nuclear nonproliferation regime. In return for civilian nuclear cooperation, India had to accede to the non-NPT regulations and institutions of the nonproliferation regime. Thus, contrary to prevailing notions, the nuclear agreement was an attempt by the Bush administration to accommodate India---the recalcitrant anomaly---within the nonproliferation regime.
机译:在过去的三十多年中,美国禁止向印度转让先进的核技术,这是《不扩散核武器条约》(NPT)的未签署国。 1998年,在对核不扩散制度的空前挑战中,印度超越了核门槛,宣布自己为核武器国家,以制裁的形式引起华盛顿的愤怒。然而,2005年,在印度发生核问题的七年之内,布什政府保证恢复与核例外地区印度的全面民用核合作。 2005年的美印核合作协议引起了强烈的反响,并引发了一场争议之风。这项研究利用政权理论来研究美印核协议是否破坏或使印度进入了核不扩散制度。这项研究检查了美国对印度核不扩散政策变化的演变;印度对先进技术的追求对以NPT为中心的核不扩散制度提出了持续的挑战。尽管实行了技术禁运,美国未能阻止印度在1998年实现核突破,也无法有效应对印度带来的扩散后挑战。在21世纪全球核形势发生变化的情况下,特别是在2001年9月对美国进行恐怖袭击之后,华盛顿意识到将印度排除在防扩散制度之外对国际安全无益。这项研究得出的结论是,2005年的《美国-印度民用核协议》并未提供进入印度核国家的无限技术途径,但与核不扩散制度的原则和规范是一致的。作为民用核合作的回报,印度必须加入不扩散条约的不扩散条约和机构。因此,与普遍的观念相反,核协议是布什政府试图在不扩散制度中适应印度-顽固的反常现象。

著录项

  • 作者

    Bhatia, Vandana.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Alberta (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 University of Alberta (Canada).;
  • 学科 Political Science International Relations.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2012
  • 页码 289 p.
  • 总页数 289
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 老年病学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号