首页> 外文学位 >Corporate social responsibility practices and financial performance over time for selected U.S. corporations.
【24h】

Corporate social responsibility practices and financial performance over time for selected U.S. corporations.

机译:特定美国公司随时间推移的企业社会责任实践和财务绩效。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is a subject long debated since the 1930s, but the premises of the topic in regards to the what, how, why, and to whom it should be remain in question. The relation between CSR and corporate financial performance (CFP) has emerged at the forefront of this debate, particularly within the last 30 years, yet no unified theory has been reached. Other scholars interested in CSR have criticized the emphasis on CFP as a means of economic justification for what they believe to be a broader social issue, and have attempted to redirect the focus in CSR research to include other motivations and outcomes associated with organizational stakeholders other than shareholders.;Using a descriptive and instrumental stakeholder theory approach, the focus of the current study was to explore CSR practices in both a dependent and independent sense. These theoretical underpinnings reflect stakeholder management decisions based on organizational characteristics, and the strategic management of various organizational stakeholders, respectively. The study population consisted of a diverse array of 353 U.S.-based corporations, 80% from the Fortune 500. Data included eleven corporate classification variables that represented organizations' geographical location, industry, executive leadership dimensions, and financial health. It also included six CFP variables that represented accounting and market-based measures, and seven CSR variables that represented the key organizational stakeholders of the local community and environment, employees, and customers. The corporate classification variables were utilized to assess CSR performances, while CFP was assessed by analyzing differences among levels of the CSR practices. These assessments were performed for organizations for the twelve years within 1991--2002.;Several results that assisted in informing descriptive and instrumental stakeholder theory were produced through the examination of previously used and under-explored variables. Specifically, the study results included new insights regarding how several organizational characteristics related to their CSR practices. Study findings provided elaboration regarding how performance differences in seven key CSR categories affected six representative accounting and market-based measures of corporate financial performance. Implications for practice for organizational decision-makers are provided along with detailed information pertaining to how, with inferences as to why, firms engage in CSR. Additionally, associated financial outcomes from different levels of CSR implementation are reported.;Key findings from the study were that the CSR practices regarding employees and the environment remained stable over the twelve-year time period. Additionally, organizations' geographical location, financial health, and corporate leadership dimensions had an impact on CSR practices for various stakeholder groups, with the exception of employees. A high level of investment in CSR for certain stakeholder groups did not produce the best financial outcomes in all cases; however, organizations that emphasized CSR in the categories relative to the community and its employees outperformed others with respect to certain financial performance measures.
机译:自1930年代以来,企业社会责任(CSR)一直是争论不休的话题,但是该主题的前提是关于它的内容,方式,原因和对象。企业社会责任与公司财务绩效(CFP)之间的关系已经出现在这场辩论的最前沿,尤其是在过去30年中,但尚未达成统一的理论。其他对企业社会责任感兴趣的学者批评强调将CFP作为他们认为是更广泛的社会问题的经济理由的手段,并试图将CSR研究的重点转移到包括与组织利益相关者相关的其他动机和成果,而不是使用一种描述性和工具性的利益相关者理论方法,本研究的重点是在独立和独立的意义上探索企业社会责任实践。这些理论基础分别反映了基于组织特征的利益相关者管理决策以及各个组织利益相关者的战略管理。研究人群由353家位于美国的公司组成,其中来自财富500强的公司占80%。数据包括11个公司分类变量,分别代表组织的地理位置,行业,高管领导层和财务状况。它还包括代表会计和基于市场的度量标准的六个CFP变量,以及代表本地社区和环境,员工和客户的关键组织利益相关者的七个CSR变量。公司分类变量用于评估CSR绩效,而CFP通过分析CSR实践水平之间的差异来评估。这些评估是针对1991--2002年的十二年中的组织进行的;通过检查先前使用和探索不足的变量,得出了有助于描述性和工具性利益相关者理论的若干结果。具体而言,研究结果包括有关几种组织特征如何与其CSR实践相关的新见解。研究结果详细阐述了七个关键企业社会责任类别的绩效差异如何影响六项代表性会计和基于市场的企业财务绩效指标。提供了对组织决策者的实践启示,以及有关企业如何参与企业社会责任的详细信息。此外,还报告了不同级别的企业社会责任实施相关的财务成果。该研究的主要发现是,有关员工和环境的企业社会责任实践在十二年期间保持稳定。此外,组织的地理位置,财务状况和公司领导力方面对除员工以外的各种利益相关者团体的CSR做法都有影响。对于某些利益相关者群体而言,在企业社会责任方面进行大量投资并不能在所有情况下产生最佳的财务成果。但是,就某些财务绩效指标而言,在相对于社区及其雇员的类别中强调企业社会责任的组织要胜过其他组织。

著录项

  • 作者单位

    Texas A&M University.;

  • 授予单位 Texas A&M University.;
  • 学科 Business Administration Management.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 1542 p.
  • 总页数 1542
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号