首页> 外文学位 >A window on Russia: The Moscow myth in twentieth-century Russian literature and culture (Marina Tsvetaeva, Mikhail Afanas'evich Bulgakov, Vladimir Mayakovsky).
【24h】

A window on Russia: The Moscow myth in twentieth-century Russian literature and culture (Marina Tsvetaeva, Mikhail Afanas'evich Bulgakov, Vladimir Mayakovsky).

机译:关于俄罗斯的窗口:20世纪俄罗斯文学和文化中的莫斯科神话(玛丽娜·茨维塔耶娃,米哈伊尔·阿凡纳斯·埃维奇·布尔加科夫,弗拉基米尔·玛雅科夫斯基)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

My dissertation explores the Moscow Text and the development of the Moscow myth as a literary, philosophical, and cultural phenomenon in the 20th century within the context of modernist and postmodernist aesthetics. Viewing the Moscow myth through the prism of literary as well as cultural studies I show that in the twentieth century Moscow can be considered a "window on Russia."; With Moscow undergoing a number of historical and socio-political changes in the course of its history, the Moscow myth has been reevaluated many times, in particular, during the Silver age, early Soviet literature, and Russian postmodernism. In the first part of my dissertation, I concentrate on Tsvetaeva's, Mayakovsky's, and Bulgakov's refigurations of the traditional Moscow myth as formulated in the classics of Russian literature. In a separate chapter on Bulgakov, in which I consider a variety of his texts in addition to Master and Margarita, I analyze Bulgakov's reversal of the traditional paradigm of the Moscow myth within the context of the Moscow-Petersburg dichotomy, demonstrating how Bulgakov's Moscow acquires many features associated with the Petersburg myth. I view the Moscow of Marina Tsvetaeva as the embodiment of the traditional Moscow myth and, revealing how Tsvetaeva's vision of Moscow changes, show how the Soviet Moscow departs from its traditional mythology. I examine refigurations of the traditional Moscow myth, as epitomized in Tsvetaeva's Moscow in the second part of my dissertation, devoted to the texts of Bulat Okudzhava and Nikolai Klimontovich.; My chapter on Russian postmodernism discusses the concept of the city as a philosophical reference point within the context of official ideology and addresses the literary phenomenon of Moscow within the framework of postmodernist aesthetics (as seen in texts of Dmitrii Prigov and Vladimir Sorokin), as well as in popular culture. My research on post-perestroika Moscow includes a comparative analysis of Ukrainian postmodernist Iurii Andrukhovych's controversial novel Moskoviada and Adam Mickiewicz's Dziady. Andrukhovych's appropriation of Mickiewicz's urban and Imperial criticisms of St. Petersburg for his portrayal of contemporary Moscow further confirms my thesis about the reversal of Moscow's and Petersburg's status in the Russian cultural mythology of the twentieth century.
机译:我的论文探讨了《莫斯科文本》,并在现代主义和后现代主义美学的背景下探讨了莫斯科神话作为20世纪文学,哲学和文化现象的发展。从文学和文化研究的角度来看莫斯科神话,我表明在二十世纪,莫斯科可以被视为“俄罗斯的窗口”。随着莫斯科在其历史进程中经历了许多历史和社会政治变革,尤其是在白银时代,早期苏联文学和俄罗斯后现代主义时期,莫斯科神话被重新评估了许多次。在论文的第一部分中,我主要研究茨维塔耶娃,玛雅科夫斯基和布尔加科夫对俄国文学经典中对传统莫斯科神话的改造。在关于布尔加科夫的另一章中,除了大师和玛格丽塔之外,我还考虑了他的各种著作,我在莫斯科-彼得斯堡二分法的背景下分析了布尔加科夫对莫斯科神话传统范式的逆转,论证了布尔加科夫的莫斯科如何获得与彼得斯堡神话有关的许多功能。我认为玛丽娜·茨维塔耶娃的莫斯科是传统莫斯科神话的化身,并揭示了茨维塔耶娃对莫斯科的看法如何变化,表明苏联莫斯科是如何偏离其传统神话的。在论文的第二部分中,我考察了传统的莫斯科神话的变种,在茨维塔耶娃的莫斯科中得到了概括,这些文字专门论述了布拉特·奥库扎瓦(Bulat Okudzhava)和尼古拉·克里蒙托维奇(Nikolai Klimontovich)的著作。我关于俄罗斯后现代主义的章节在官方意识形态的背景下讨论了城市作为哲学参照点的概念,并在后现代主义美学的框架内(如德米特里·普里戈夫和弗拉基米尔·索罗金的著作中所述)论述了莫斯科的文学现象。就像在大众文化中一样我对莫斯科后革命的研究包括对乌克兰后现代主义者尤里·安德鲁霍维奇(Iurii Andrukhovych)有争议的小说《莫斯科维》的比较分析和亚当·米基维兹(Adam Mickiewicz)的《狄亚迪》。安德鲁霍维奇(Andrukhovych)对米基维奇(Mickiewicz)对圣彼得堡的城市和帝国主义的批判对他的当代莫斯科的描写得到了认可,这进一步证实了我关于莫斯科和彼得斯堡在20世纪俄罗斯文化神话中的地位倒转的论点。

著录项

  • 作者

    Lechtchenko, Natalia.;

  • 作者单位

    Brown University.;

  • 授予单位 Brown University.;
  • 学科 Literature Slavic and East European.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2005
  • 页码 267 p.
  • 总页数 267
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 各国文学;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:42:37

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号